I called it out that the sense about talking about it and you ignored it, its the truth
You mean besides the videos of the gun firing and wobbling everywhere?
Because that is possible since a long time lol? That doesnt need to be proven
Either way gonna go to a new years party bye
1 Like
how can a man get a shell out and aim a gun at the same time?
What’s the point of me responding to an offtopic? I see no point in discussing game balance with you because you are too bad at the game to discuss it
Pretty on topic ,we are talking about the gun of the vehicles
How did the russians do it in ww2 lol, its a skill issue mostly . But i know you propably cant comprehend that
Either way realy my last one, him not giving a real statement about the guns accuracy compared to western ones and their implementation ,combined with dodging the question says enough.
He picks and chooses the bias when its fits him
1 Like
I essentially don’t care about some of the conventions as there are plenty of them on both sides.
You somehow forget that a leopard must have a minimum of 3 crew members to function as presented in the game with 2.
There are many other examples of “bias” (as you call it). For example apache thermal imagers should be 1st generation, not 3+ as in the game. Only the AH-64D should be 2nd generation.
Do I call it bias? no, it’s just a small flaw or laziness.
If you want to change the accuracy of IFV guns, make a bugreport with tech data. Find the variance data of the guns and present it.
In essence I don’t have those numbers (and neither do you), so I just can’t have this dialog.
How do I know what is or isn’t accurate if I haven’t read any documentation about it? I ignore topics that I don’t understand and are off-topic
It’d be nice to see this come soon, especially since we got stuff like the Puma and Lynx
speaking of such IFV’s, what was gaijins reason for the spectacular nerf for the PUMAs accuracy?
1 Like
Honestly, who knows, I’d like to know myself.
ik, its completely butchered…
i would understand it if they gave the PUMA a variable ROF like on helicopters in game (ive heard the gun is restricted to its current ROF for accuracy) but just flat out??? damn man
1 Like
I’m pretty sure the Puma is supposed to have a burst fire mode which increases its fire rate significantly.
I feel like eventually gaijin will get around to modeling that.
1 Like
hopefully… it would be nice to have… an easy way to do it is to make a temporary ‘first stage ammo rack’ aside from the real first stage ammo rack.
this temporary one would fire the burst amount of round and require idk like 0.5? seconds to full reload.
this would prove useful when suddenly facing those pesky 2S38’s
1 Like
TOR-M1
TOR-M2
Strela-1M
Supposedly this one was rumored and datamined.
Pantsir-S2
Spoiler
9K33M3 Osa
There are earlier variants but I don’t think it’s necessary to list them all off.
Spoiler
T38 STILET (Modernized Belarusian Osa)
Spoiler
1 Like
Would a semi fictional T14 be anymore offensive to top tier than the semi fictional or prototype vehicles implemented in much lower BRs? I have never been able to get my head around War Thunder’s constant phasing in and out of reality and the player base’s acceptance of it.
I’m actually waiting for the version with the 57mm low ballistic cannon and extra missiles (EPOCH module). I’m not interested in the BMP-2M module anymore
This gun has its own APFSDS c interesting design. Should penetrate about 150-160mm of armor and 8 small kornets
1 Like
Why do you call it that?
Speaking of KF-51, Abrams X and T-14, the latter is the most realistic and produced tank.
KF-51 is a couple of prototype demonstrators. Abrams X is one papier mache prototype that has almost nothing planned at this point. T-14 - prototype batches of dozens of tanks
1 Like
Yeah it was a tech demo just to show what they could do to the abrams
Because if even a quarter of it is top secret and unknown, the fiction or creative license comes into play at vehicle design level to a degree possibly higher than it ever had before and yet you guys are all screaming for realism.
Look at the fuss over DU in the game? Does it even matter in the point and click world of War Thunder? Half the chat on this forum relating to later MBTs is quibbling over minor detail like where DU might be placed and yet those same people would entertain a T14 that nobody knows a thing about including the Russian people it seems. We dont even know if the project was cancelled. You might see an Amata in Ukraine next week or never see one on the battlefield ever. It will be just another fictional WT tank .Might as well bring back the WW2 stuff Gaijin scrapped.