Oh god please no, TTs should remain atleast somewhat unique.
Like, whats the point of just adding copy pasted vehicles from other nations to the tech trees? I really dont understand it at all, unless the vehicle had some special significance stuff should remain largely domestic.
Youll end up otherwise with whats happening in top tier rn. At first only germany had leopards and sweden had their own licensed leopards with a caveat that they are better armored but have shittier gun.
Now we have copy paste leopards in french and italian TT. I shudder to think what other nations are gonna get the same copy pasted vehicle into their TT through “subtrees” or some random decision from gaijin until the top tier is just 50 shades of leopard.
M44 got added to what, 4 or 5 nations at 4.0, theres leopards in 4 out of 9 nations. I cant wait for “chinese” Abrams to arrive as well, plus China has already received a copy paste french Mirage. Theres people crying about how gaijin should add Indian Rafale as well to the british tree.
In the end theres gonna be fuck all uniqueness and its just gonna be the same 4 vehicles fighting each other.
Great job… In copy-pasting. One of almost biggest tt with its own vehicles, trying to do something with other countries vehicle. I still see complaining about stealing USSR tech vehicles, but you do the same. Great job, nothing to say.
I mainly suggest vehicles that were used in combat, with a few one offs and for the most part they seem to be received well according to the poll.
But I can understand where you come from, but I care mostly about the history of their use in Soviet service rather than the copy and paste aspect, everyone has their taste.
I just want those:
T-43
T-34E Gorky
KV-7 (the one with two 76 mm guns)
BT-7A
BT-7A (F-32) (for the tree itself)
A-20
A-27
A-32
A-34
T-50E
T-80 Mod. (the WW2 one)
T-80UM-2 (the one with the turret autoloader)
Object 278
Object 277