My stats are better than yours and I still think it really should be 6.0, and the '44 variant at 6.3. Having a shell that gets volumetric’d with a long reload, despite its power, isn’t enough to warrant their current BR’s
u mean the same czech that already cancelled 2a8 stuff and instead decided to get cv90120 instead because price wise its the better alternative?
Stop dreaming
Czech Republic never decided to end the Leopard 2A8 deal at at all. The final deal is planned to be signed this summer. Slovakia, on the other hand, truly showed their interest in CV90120, but nothing specific is known really.
L-39ZA - used by practically every soviet/Warsaw pact country
M53/59 - same, to much lesser extent, also was needed to fill gaps and is a much more Soviet like vehicle
Russia does not need a subtree right now, and any subtree that should be added should be Belarus. Belarus doesn’t even need to be added, just look at the USSR ground suggestion page, there is plenty of non-copypaste vehicles that could be added
Turning USSR into a NATO tech tree would kinda break the game
I agree with the sentiment but gaijin has deigned that the reverse isint true (turning nato trees into commblock) so 2a8 etc is very much on the table tho i would loathe to see them in the tree.
Also since I’m getting flagged for no reason.
(There is no crew present in my photos.)
Some of the BTRs we should see, not counting the BTR-82A/AT which are confirmed to be coming
For me it would be interesting if they added the T-54A, the T-55AMV and the T-72B without Kontakt-1 and with different armor (there were like three models of completely different armor).