brother got the mossiles, they look so stubby
1 Like
Asking for the Rubezh-M to be added makes no sense, its like asking for a scud launcher, the minimum range would be bigger than any map in the game, also its an active radar anti SHIP missile, not designed to be anwhere near sensitive enough to pick up small targets like tanks.
That is a very interesting claim, do you have a picture of said prototype? from what I can recall, 2A83 and the other 152mm smoothbore prototypes haven’t seen the light of day since Obj.195 was cancelled.
Probably my last iteration of possible lend lease
of vehicles missing as of right now.
(There’s probably a few minor ones missing)
Reserve/1.0
Tetrarch I
2.0
P-400
2.3
M3A1 Stuart
Valentine II
Valentine III
2.7
M17 MGMC
Matilda II Mk III
Matilda II Mk IV
Valentine VII
M5A1
M3 Lee (Late)
3.0
Valentine X
3.3
M10 GMC
P-47D-10-RE (Knight of Pythias)
A-20 Boston Mk.3
3.7
M24
Mustang Mk.I
Cromwell Mk IV
4.0
M4A2 (75mm)
M4A4
Churchill III
Churchill II Mk IV
Spitfire Mk.Vb
5.3
M4A2(76)W HVSS
5.7
T70 GMC (M18 Hellcat pre production)
6.0
M4A3(76)W HVSS (M4A3E8)
6.7
T26E3
A small chunk of things I’d like to see
Gibka-S/Mod-2024
Luchnik
BMD-2M (916-sb3KDZ)
Spoiler
Tracked BM-21 prototype
Ramka-99
Spoiler
Typhoon K-4386-VDV
2S25M Mod.2022
BTR-RD
Ka-32A7
Ka-29VPNTsU
Mi-24P-1M
4 Likes
what ATGMs does the Ramka-99 have?
Kornet, unlike the atakas on the service BMPTs
1 Like
This configuration was never finished, it’s just a running mockup to demonstrate the idea.
I would rather Mi-24PN and
I would rather that with new sighting complex which would put it on Mi-35M level.
Spoiler
Mi-24PN wasnt just serial, but also unique due to using russian “Nocturn” tank 2nd gen thermal as a basis for it’s sight.
Would be great addition to the game, especially 5th or 3rd variant, 5th didnt just have 1500 HP diesel but also had thermal with new style hull, while 3rd could be a lower tier version with GTD-1500.
They would be great to add after T-90A or T-72B3, offering worse firepower at cost of better mobility and protection, as well as worse electronics (only 5th having 1nd gen Agava 2 thermal)
5th - 1250hp engine and agava
6th - 1500hp engine without agava
Well, that’s simply my list, not yours.
Plus I want Mi-24P-1M since it was shown off with Sosna, so nothing saying it couldn’t use it on a Shturm rack.
Mark V (Captured by the Red Army/Used by the White Army)
FT-17 (Captured by the Red Army/Used by the White Army)
Russian FT-17 Copy (Freedom Fighter Comrade Lenin)
Dude how many Burlaks are in existence? Is this an experimental Tank or has it been adopted into service, what about the black eagle, will that ever see the light of day? Plus all these T-15s and Kurganets vehicles are they also in limbo, or in service?
Man how about we get a version of the IS-7 in tech tree?
The coastal missile system is not really viable in game at this point.
More than Challanger 3)
Well, Challenger 3 is more like a test version than a adopted into service vehicle. I am not sure about Chally 3 in British army in terms of quantity. As for the Burlak tank I have only seen one picture of it, the exact same one on the above mentioned posts.
Who care if they have great pictures of it, we should get a version of it in tech-tree with same performance as the 200000000 billion dollar one. We should all lobby gajiin.