Why we should add the Bell XP-77

Adding the Bell XP-77 to War Thunder would introduce a unique and historically significant aircraft that offers a distinct playstyle for enthusiasts of unconventional and experimental fighters. Here’s why it deserves a place in the game:

  1. Unique Design and Gameplay Experience: The Bell XP-77 was a lightweight, wood-constructed fighter designed to be a nimble and agile interceptor, much like the air racers of the 1930s. With its low weight and small size, it would offer a unique flying experience, emphasizing speed, maneuverability, and tactical dogfighting over raw firepower or armor.
  2. Historical Rarity and Significance: Only two prototypes of the XP-77 were ever built, making it one of the rarest aircraft of World War II. Adding this aircraft to the game would allow players to experience flying a plane that never saw mass production or combat but played a role in exploring the limits of lightweight fighter design during the war.
  3. Challenging Flight Characteristics: The XP-77 was known for being tricky to handle, with visibility issues and underwhelming performance due to its underpowered engine. This would provide a challenge to experienced players, offering a different kind of test for their piloting skills compared to more conventional aircraft in the game.
  4. Historical Experimentation: The XP-77 represents the USAAF’s experimentation with non-strategic materials during wartime. Its inclusion would not only add a unique aircraft but also highlight a fascinating aspect of WWII aviation history—the exploration of alternative materials and designs in response to wartime resource constraints.
  5. Tactical Versatility: Despite its limitations, the XP-77 was armed with a 20 mm Hispano cannon and .50 caliber machine guns, making it a capable fighter in the hands of a skilled pilot. Its potential loadout options, including bombs and depth charges, would allow players to experiment with various tactical roles, from air-to-air combat to light ground attack missions.

Including the Bell XP-77 in War Thunder would add depth to the game’s aircraft roster, providing a rare and challenging option for players interested in the more experimental side of aviation history.
image

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 22 ft 10 in (6.96 m)
  • Wingspan: 27 ft 6 in (8.38 m)
  • Height: 8 ft 2 in (2.49 m)
  • Wing area: 100 sq ft (9.3 m2)
  • Empty weight: 2,855 lb (1,295 kg)
  • Max takeoff weight: 4,028 lb (1,827 kg)
  • Powerplant: 1 × [Ranger V-770]-7 inverted [V12 engine], 520 hp (388 kW)
  • Propellers: 2-bladed

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 330 mph (530 km/h, 290 kn)
  • Range: 550 mi (890 km, 480 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 30,100 ft (9,180 m)
  • Rate of climb: 3,600 ft/min (18.3 m/s)
  • Wing loading: 40.28 lb/sq ft (196.5 kg/m2)
  • [Power/mass]: .13 hp/lb (213 W/kg)

Armament

  • Guns:

    • 1 × [20 mm]) (0.787 in) [Hispano-Suiza HS.404]) cannon, firing through the propeller.
    • 2 × .50 in (12.7 mm) [M2 machine guns]) with 200 rounds each.
  • Bombs:

    • 1 × 300 lb (136 kg) bomb or
    • 1 × 325 lb (147 kg) depth charge
2 Likes

Facepalm People already suggested it.

Hmm yes definitely not some suggestion that was ai generated and then posted here instead when it got rejected.

11 Likes

Please name one vehicle that’s been suggested that is machine-generated.

1 Like

That’s cool and I would really like to play with it. I think it would be better with 3 or 4 props tho . . . lol

1 Like

He is not saying the vehicle is AI generated. He is saying the suggestion is AI generated.

The XP-77 itself is very real.

5 Likes

It makes no difference in this context, this is a discussion thread, not a suggestion submission thread. So it’s pretty much pointless since it’s being “introduced” as if it were a suggestion thread.

I thought I’d give it a check and hot damn yeah, its almost completely AI generated.

image

3 Likes

I mean checking it with AI detection is just overkill.

Its obvious by the overusage of buzzwords and phrases:

Yeah that’s fair. Just fancied doing it because I’ve been getting some mileage out of it recently. Plus I think the detection tech is neat :)

1 Like

Dont get me wrong im not telling you to stop, AI generated posts should be called out.

Like i said, i just find them being used on such obvious examples overkill.

1 Like

Yea the post is def AI generated but don’t take these AI detector serious lol, literal snake oil if u ask me.