This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
8 Likes
God no. We dont need it in the British TT.
10 Likes
Same reason Sweden gets mi28
4 Likes
However, if we are going to introduce it into the game, then only Britain, well, or the USSR, since it is their tank building school that is visible in t84. What is strange is that the country whose republic, as well as Russia, developed your tank, was not given it, and the Pakistani version was given out of nowhere.
Which is strange in general. At least Sweden had it, not to mention Pakistan, which only owned it for a couple of days and refused. In general, we are currently considering the t84)
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
13 Likes
China does not have a Thai VT-4 in-game.
And Pakistan goes to China.
3 Likes
cuz pakistan sold oil to china? idk lmao
Bro, how cool you are reading my thoughts, I came here with exactly the same Thought, why in recent updates more and more people are trying to guess China, then Western planes, then prototypes, okay with vt4, that they were given a Japanese tank. I don’t have much patience anymore, and we’re still watching them strengthen a “weak” nation by stuffing everything into it. As they say, whoever has the money is the master
Yes, they are still in contact across borders, which is a reason to add t84! And China is located a couple thousand km From America, which is a reason for the m1a2 SEP v4!
1 Like
There is. Vt4 should be in the Japanese branch under the flag of Thailand, not British Pakistan.
1 Like
I didnt realise the T-84 was a British tank
Wierd flase flagging
4 Likes
I didn’t say that the t84 was a British tank, maybe the translator translated it that way, since I speak Russian, I translate it to you through a translator. I wrote that it would be more logical to add the Pakistan branch to Britain, since they had a historical connection, and not to China, which has nothing to do with them.
Again, not really. Didnt need South Afirca or India, we certainly dont need Pakistan too
and I think Pakistan is a sub-TT of China
8 Likes
I am also very sure the T-84 Oplot of Pakistan is lighter and a little more unique then the Ukraine one in real life. I am unsure about ingame. However about the VT-4 things, we have a chance to see it in the next few major update as Mr Smin has confirmed that we wouldn’t see any this update.
I don’t understand what your message is, you say you don’t need more tanks, but at the same time, I’m telling you who it would be more logical to add a tank to. Pakistan only bought al Khalid from China, but no more, no relation, that’s all. In general, it is most logical to add it specifically to the USSR, because this is their tank building school. I’m just unhappy that China, which is already strong, is being reinforced with tanks that they don’t want to deal with.
I’ll even say more, it’s not Oplot-P, but Oplot-M, exactly the same as Japan’s. It is not logical why the tank of the Soviet school is located in other countries besides the Soviet Union itself. I’m more annoyed that again a tank that has nothing to do with China is being added to them.
I understand about the soviet part alot and I do agree with that, however it isn’t really Japan fault nor China fault it more of the Subtech tree placement. Most important of all is that the T-84 Oplot is represented as Pakistan so it more of Gaijin issue…
They wouldn’t just “randomly” add 2 tanks of other Nations to China for nothing. It has long been known that snails love the country whose people contribute the most money. After all, there is nowhere else to get Oplot updates from China. They will also add M1a2 in the future.
If you don’t want them to add those anymore it better if you suggest them to move pakistan and Taiwan outside of Chinese tree.
1 Like