yeah its not just minors that get done dirty cause of classified stuff basically all countrys have this problem
rather than nerfing they should be buffing nerfing is completely bogus
Why in hell should they nerf the already 2 best tanks in the game. Either nerf, or buf everyone else, top tier needs diversity
toptier needs realism which is not what we got
what is your point on that? I have never heard that complaint
russian ammo not exploding upon hit
DU armor still modeled immproperly
Aircraft being main force in ground RB etc
Aircraft are usually the main force in modern conflicts
Russian carrousels dont explode because sometimes ammo simply is not hit, people carry very few rounds, and that only happens with the T90 series
1 Like
T80 uses hydralics with highly flamble fluids which when damaged catch fire
Spoiler
oh another thing HESH and APCR and SOLID SHOT doing like zero damage despite being on par with filler rounds hence why britain never switched
What? NO DUDE
Abrams, also known as fat american tank is one of the worse tank in the game(aside from Ariete, Merkavas) It now has the same survivability of Challengers, worse hull armor than Leclerc(who would have guess, also this goes for upper and upper upper hull only). The turret basket addition should lower the damage output/absorbing spall of the tank instead of creating more spall which now makes it even more easy to one shot
yes but they face significant challenge from SPAA which ingame is not case
but you loose your horizontal making you a free kill still waiting on nato anti era tips
A lot of people play the US, so we should nerf the already terrible Abrams, because it’s totally the vehicle’s performance causing the high numbers! Just make sure to ignore that there is no other top tier MBT for the US or Germany.
Nerfing them again would change nothing but the fact that other minor nations get some justice
Nerf the Leopard all you want, but the Abrams does not need nerfs. Minor nation tanks need buffs and fixes, and the Abrams does as well
how is the big horizontal drive a good addition when its not even accurate?
the accurate depiction of turret basket in real life is
crew sit, crew movement, crew protected, partially absorb shrapnel, partially absorb spall impact, minimal electronic and system related to traverse
ingame its crew sit, crew movement, crew unprotected, create more shrapnel, create more spall impact, filled with electronic and system related to traverse
Tldr
Bibroms bad
Bussian rias
6 Likes
Bussian bias bis bussin
I agree with your words, however, however, you now attract the wrath of Leopard fans and especially the so-called average US players with their horrible skill rates who probably go flood your post about how bad the Abrams is, is Russian Bias, but they will never admit their skill problems, in the case of the Leopard, it’s very sad. I really like playing with my 2A7, but now I’m going to have to be careful since now my tank simply won’t swallow the shot without any damage and I’ll turn around and shoot back at the enemy.
1 Like
Soviets, USA, Sweden, China, and Germany, to a lesser extent France and Italy with their Leopards.
Them having autoloaders/baskets modeled doesn’t instill bias though.
Autoloader being hit means you have one shot at most left.
A basket damaged means you can still fight, as I did the other day when someone locked my turret.
Learning to fight with a locked turret was the first thing I learned in War Thunder as within my first matches in the test for ground I got my Panther turret locked while stock on Kuban, and had to run around fragging people with a dead turret rotation.
1 Like