Thats hell of a list of skill issues.
Its a list of the horseshit pulled in the last five years for no rhyme or reason
Just like French tier IV and V BRs getting perpetually thrown up
EBR is a perfect example
EBR hasn’t changed BR in well over a year.
And their current BRs are fine. I even got a nuke with the 7.3-7.7 one.
1 Like
Nah you are just asking for handholding BR so you dont need to learn how to play those vehicles. Jumbos and pershing demands show that perfectly since how much they are out of touch. EBR is also fine at 6.7, especially since lots of modern 7.3-7.7 vehicles were moved up. Read and learn before making ridicolous statements.
You can’t be a real person
›Tiger 1 equivalents being 6.X BR because ???
›Shermans with 3.7 BR guns being 5.7 and even 6.3 because ???
I don’t ever expect the M26 to go to an appropriate BR because despite being an American Tiger 1 its always been a full BR above where it should be
T25 was fine at 5.7 where it sat for years
Oh you’re new as fuck
Those are the BRs they held for years since before you even started playing lol
2 Likes
I mean tbh, gameplay of Jumbo 75 where you just drive around shooting at people guns because they are angled by 1 degree and you can no longer pen them, just to run into Tiger2 and get lolpenned anywhere is kinda cringe for me. I like american tanks, but i also think that some vehicles simply dont have a right place in BR bracket and will be always either clubbed or clubbers.
the only thing that saves the jumbo 75 is the fact that its armor is hella good for its br having a very small weakspot, but yea the cannon on that is awfull for its br as you said if someone angle a little bit your not able to pen him at all.
but tbh the jumbo 76 is fine for me, your just gonna struggle against tiger 2 H against the P variant is easy easy to pen
Against is2’s you can pen easily too and even oneshoot him using the m62 shell so i see no problem with that too
It’s the equivalent to what USA players typically deal with daily. No need to cry about an armored hard to kill tank IN THE CORRECT 7.0 BR. You should try using a 5.7 br Sherman against the 5.7 panzer or the 5.3 panther D.
Example:
Panther D- 5.3
192 mm of penetration with
80mm of sloped front hull armor equivalent to 130 to 150mm of protection(warthunder mercy is the deciding factor)
130mm front turret plate
T1E1- 5.3
149 mm of penetration
Actual UFP is around 92mm with minimal slope
Front turret plate is 51mm
The t1e1 cannot pen the frontal hull armor of the panther from any distance. It can however pen the turret plate if your aim is dead center of the plate, is perfect…… if the shot is off by 2” up or down it will not pen the turret plate’.
The panther D can pen all areas of the UFP and turret on t1e1 . The only plate with enough protection is the LFP which does not even cover crew members.
To Summarize all this crap, people complaining about an American tank with a alright gun and good turret armor being lowered .3 is bogus.
Clearly some players have been spoiled with an advantage in armor & firepower and it really shows on this post.
I know Russians and Germans don’t ever want to die in battle and constantly receive endless free SL. I promise though,The slight strain this t32 turret armor may cause will be a bump in the road to your never ending wins and silver lions. Do not fret. The t32 is not a threat to your EASY MODE GAMEPLAY.
haha lol
and the jumbo is one of them, to low in br and they curbstomp everything, to high and you need some brain to play it…
something that some people here seem to lack
and there is the problem, sorry but you are dumb and want the easy point and click gameplay…
Perfect example how to do it
If you cant do it it’s nothing more then a L2P issue sorry
5 Likes
You aren’t supposed to shoot at the hull. Aim at the turret cheeks. Never shoot at the hull using a full size round.
1 Like
Lmao another copium takes. 3.7 cannon bcs it exists on 3.7 vehicle? Great, t34-57 has 2.7 cannon, guess it is time to move it down 2 BRs lol.
And yes pershing is way better than each tiger 1. You can cope as much as you want.
T32 is easy mode gameplay, I absolutely love that tank
All you and @Ford1639 do it seems is charge frontally at the enemy and expect win, further proving you have no idea how to play any of those tanks.
1 Like
The secret to the jumbo is attacking the sides. Its terrible gun is hardly a threat unless they make it to the sides. The Sherman’s 75 or 76 are kinda like a BB gun at 6.3. (Exaggeration)
All heavy armored tanks frontally are a little intimidating. Although The jumbo is probably the least intimidating to me because of the gun. The maus or the is-7 or the is-3 are the tanks I hate running into head on. The jumbo will have to shoot your tracks and shoot barrel or vice versa, it can sometimes be a little difficult to get a kill in jumbo. I sure do love my cobra king though!
It’s really hard to balance 6.3 to 8.7 vehicles. Those BRs are extremely compressed.
If you separate the gun and the reload, then the IS-3 absolutely has the better gun (more powerful rounds).
Penetration graphs
Penetration values for 122 mm BR-471B APHEBC (red), 122 mm BR-471D APCBC (blue) and 90 mm T41 APCBC (green) at point blank against armor at different angles.
Same as before but this time at 1000 meters.
Disclaimer: Due to the way these values are calculated, the 80+° penetration values are purely theoretical. This to say that the slope modifiers at those very high angles exist, but the rounds will actually ricochet against the armor plates at those angles. The actual penetration that can be achieved at these very high obliquities and obtained by dividing the projectile’s caliber by 7 (full overmatch), which means the 122 mm would penetrate more.
At point blank, BR-471B has better penetration past roughly 27°, but BR-471D simply has objectively higher penetration than T41. At 1000 meters, BR-471B only gains the advantage past roughly 36°, but yet again BR-471D is simply better everywhere.
The IS-3 undeniably has more powerful ammunition. Not only does it have higher penetration, it also has overpressure in its APHE rounds. It’s just that this advantage is countered by the superior reload of the T32.
2 Likes
Nope. IS-3 has inferior rounds.
They don’t pen as well, and can’t deal with heavy tanks of its own BR let alone punch up.
T32E1 struggles in that regard as well but far less so.
Your graphs are dismissed as you omitted the meta round: T44.
IS-3 has an inferior gun, get over it.
America is better.
Bro, I’m only trying provide an example of what some other nations believe to be unfair for them, is normal for USA. People claiming the T32 is over armored for 7.0 can’t be real.
yes the t32 has better guns but the is3 has way better armor, both of them have trouble killing eachother from the front
so i think your argument isn’t helping in anything, since the is3 has too much armor to get its br lowered and its gun is enough against 7.3 tanks since the armor doesn’t increase much with the exception of the heavy tanks.
but with all that you can’t get the is3 to 7.0 without making the ballance be completly shit but since the t32 has spots that it can be pen, it could get onto a lower BR
1 Like
T32 and T32E1 have far superior armor to IS3.
Which is why T32E1 is 7.7 as well.
Send me some of the videos? The t32 is to slow and armor protection has no value in an up tier. I’m terrible with it though. I’m a t29 guy all the way.