Why NATO IFVs autocannons are so BAD?

Ok, I must have missed something reading back through the thread, I thought we where talking about the BMP-2M, my bad.

is ok :3

1 Like

We already have numerous selective realism in the game, tanks that didn’t exist with whatever stats, pylons that could but never did carrying missiles never used, they’ll say it’s added to keep the BMPT competitive and wipe their hands. Even though it made it far easier for RU to hop in CAS and sling 0 thought KH/LMUR for the rest of the match since it farms SP like nobodies business…

I’ve come to like ACs more than MBT cannons simply because various wonky models and shots in the same place not being kills where they were before, only really struggle with RU tanks because they’re one of two who have actual armor that stops anything. In my perfect world the 9040s would have access to their entire load, but balance purposes, when deemed appropriate anyways.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1qfkpwo/even_the_t90_has_a_tracker_when_will_gaijin_add/

I’ve seen this post on reddit

Apparently, the cv90 are supposed to have tracking. But don’t, somehow

Sweeden would be very cool with IRST on their light tanks ngl

Yeah, and funnily enough the only reason the LVKV is for “balance purposes” once again, but the BMPs can track aircraft even though their doctrine was to be protected from air by ZSU and their own attempts at air were literally last ditch emergencies, but it was possible irl so that was enough to warrant.

1 Like

The BMP-2M can’t track anymore

I must’ve missed that changelog, but yeah, wild it had it to begin with lol.

1 Like

Huh…

1 Like
Spoiler




@Ghost_of_TelAviv I think that if you play as a Russian player on this forum, your opinion is invalid. BMPT has truly rented an apartment in the minds of many players.

2 Likes

That was a lie then

Leclerc is far better than M1 Abrams, MSC in their BR is an OP machine with 2A4s, and EBRC looks good and AMX are trash, I agree. France is good up to 7.7 and from MSC onwards it’s great again.

Just like the one guy that said atgm’s don’t work under 30m

Yes it’s invalid

It’s to hide the russian bias, classic

The jankiest and most unreliable to kill chassis strapped to an AC that can fire for 2 hours and rip apart 12.7 MBTs like child safe paper, I’d say it’s doing a tad too much. Crazy how nation mains never admit when their vehicle is doing too much like I did with the GR1 SRAAMS.

People will defend OP shit as normal rather than recognize it’s overpowered or has significant advantages over it’s peers to milk it for as long as they can for the easy ride…in the BMPT’s case it’s caused a literal community outcry…

2 Likes

They just buffed it, you can’t make the bmpt explode shooting at the “external” belts anymore

No.

Nobody thinks this.

1 Like

It’s my second favorite NATO tank after the Leopard, that’s why I think that, and it really is good, I was expecting something like my Type 90 and I got something better.

Well, this forum isn’t yours, you literally have no say here, and I’ll continue to give my opinion whether you like it or not.

1 Like