Why M1A2 SEP V2 Don't Have Trophy System And LWS in game

I guarantee M10 Booker was put on Gaijin’s radar the moment it was accepted for service.
Time will tell how long it takes for them to make it.

It’s been passed to devs, so maybe this year. Last year seemed to be more focused on air than ground, so this year would be the best bet.

idk they really opened the floodgates with EFT and Rafale

I would be so mad if they priorities air again this year. I’ve seen some speculation that the first update will bring the F-18, then it prioritizes ground for the rest of the year. They haven’t added a new top tier MBT in a year unless you count Leopard 2 in different nation or Leopard 2, but 50 cal.

take it up with the Air Force and Navy then lol, there are quite a few F-16 F-15 and F-18 they can add as well as F-14D that are all valid additions now that EFT and Rafale are ingame

whereas all we have for ground is strykers, some armed humvees, and maybe 2-3 more Abrams

Gaijin, give LOSAT HMMWV. That thing is another level of silly that I want so bad. Car with near hypersonic telephone poles. But I do see how there are more air additions than ground, but even then, there are still things to add. CATTB, for example. It and the Object 195 could be the final ground top tier.

1 Like

well, final ground top tier i think will be M1E3 and SEPv4 for the US and EMBT KF51 T-14 and K-2

KV-2 jumpscare. But the thing about a lot of those other tanks is that they are somewhat practical. The CATTB is literally just, “How much random stuff can we shove onto the Abrams before the torsion bars snap?” As for Object 195, think of a T-14, but it’s good. 152 millimeter gun, 30 millimeter coax, unmanned turret, etc.

1 Like

im sure itll be fun, but isnt it lacking the more modern systems necessary for current and future top tier ground RB like APS?

CATTB to M1E3/ SEPv4 would be like a trade off. It has a ton of armor and a 140, but it has an older thermal sight (First gen I think, but the other stuff it offered could be taken into account to give it second gen for balance) and no APS, as you mentioned. I think the firepower of the 140 would be worth it, especially since the more modern tanks seem to be aiming for weight reduction. As for that, it would be a, “Ha ha, take your real-life usefulness and bow before my impractical power.”

2 Likes

would be like heavy WW2 German TD’s i guess lol (jagdtiger specifically)

1 Like

Fits perfectly.

1 Like

Russia doesn’t need that only America deserves everything nothing to Russia fr fr rahhhhh

since 2 years with the implementation of gen 4 aircrafts it feeled like it was mostly air focused to me

I mean even the implementation of tier 8 ground was overshadowed by air in its update

Nuh uh, only I should have it, nobody else.
IMG_8374

1 Like

Those are F-15C equivalent platforms, the floodgates were opened with F-15C and JM.

F-15 is 70’s airframe vs 2000’s airframe for EFT and rafale, rafale has a better radar than ingame F-15C or E, EFT when fixed will have a better radar than ingame F-15C or E

3 Likes

The radars are equivalents in capability.
You are over-estimating Typhoon.
As for Rafale, it’s running MICA EMs not AIM-120s.

Even chatgpt confirms that the R-73 is better than the AIM-9M in every way.


Bro, gonna be honest, stop with these low effort posts. Spend around 5 minutes explaining what you want and why. Almost every single post of yours is just the same thing,

“gib insert american vehicle x weapon”
or
“f22 when”

Like come on man, put some effort into your posts because I can’t tell if they’re rage bait or not.

Also using chat gpt as an argument is just sad. Do the research, it isn’t hard.

3 Likes