F-15 is 70’s airframe vs 2000’s airframe for EFT and rafale, rafale has a better radar than ingame F-15C or E, EFT when fixed will have a better radar than ingame F-15C or E
3 Likes
The radars are equivalents in capability.
You are over-estimating Typhoon.
As for Rafale, it’s running MICA EMs not AIM-120s.
Bro, gonna be honest, stop with these low effort posts. Spend around 5 minutes explaining what you want and why. Almost every single post of yours is just the same thing,
“gib insert american vehicle x weapon”
or
“f22 when”
Like come on man, put some effort into your posts because I can’t tell if they’re rage bait or not.
Also using chat gpt as an argument is just sad. Do the research, it isn’t hard.
3 Likes
“Even ChatGPT” is a bad combo
4 Likes
The CATTB actually does have 2nd gen thermals not 1st gen. It also gets spall liners, LWS, and the 140 has a 5 sec auto loader with 950pen so that tank would definitely be cooking if they add it.
3 Likes
What did it add to the US tree lmao? it’s just a worse SEPv1 in game.
damn the Gaijin glazing is strong.
4 Likes
“its a secondary spawn for US and very usefull”
5 Likes
lol no. @AlvisWisla is actually correct, there are only 2 DU rounds, alll the other U.S Ammo in this game is based off of tungsten rounds. I said this years ago on the old forums and put proof to back it up. Gaijin has done everything possible to nerf U.S Tanks and Ammo. M829A2 is capable of going through 750mm+ of armor. Even the Ukrainians know this.
The fact of the matter is gaijin won’t add M829A3 Because that round is able to penetrate every single Russian tank in the game, and would see a even bigger drop in the win rates of RU / Ger top tier teams.
4 Likes
ChatGPT is not a source, and R-73 is inferior to AIM-9M in IRCCM.
@_Renzo
You’re glazing Gaijin? Or are you commenting about how people attacking me are defending Gaijin?
SEP2’s addition is as valuable as 2A6’s, and I like the SEP2 more cause it’s pretty.
Technology demonstrator used for suspension tests.
What’s supposed to be special about this…? It’s a SEPv2 with a training sim kit.
1 Like
Not a Tech Demonstrator
No idea on that one author seems to be on something.
I think he meant the MILES packages used for training, which has a LWS. Still not meant for combat and shouldn’t be added. Only the SEPv4 has a LWS meant to be used in combat.
3 Likes
womp womp
Hmm. “Karl! Grab a blowtorch and a saw! Were going to Fort Moore. We gonna do some silly stuff.”
(Fort Moore has a M1A2 SEPv4 prototype.)
1 Like
I would have thought it would be at Fort Benning
1 Like
The U.S. Army Armor and Cavalry Collection has one and it’s at Fort Moore.
1 Like
I had to look it up Moore is the new name my bad. Forgot Army went and renamed their bases.
1 Like
Oh yeah, I forgot about that.