Holy moly that’s a MASSIVE title gawd dayum
4 Likes
Who says any of that is true?
2 Likes
navals beyond dead at the moment due to how they treat every tree thats not america and russia
2 Likes
she was passed
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/ship-number-798-super-yamato-a-150-battleship/106230/52
I would rather have 1 usable ship than 3 floating ammo racks.
4 Likes
Passing a suggestion does not make it fact.
Also says nothing about Tirpitz not being added.
Thanks for debunking your headline
4 Likes
2 yamato classes, more like 2 super kaboom classes
2 Likes
We will see the Tirpitz, infact we saw it allready 3-4 years ago in an trailer
I’ve time-stamped the exact spot
(You can see the Torpedo Launcher)
Tirpitz Modell from the Big CDK Leak like 5 Years Ago
Because 51cm guns are cool.
And nobody said Tirpitz won’t appear.
1 Like
was it’s hull layed down? was it STARTED?
Tirpitz will come eventually
1 Like
likely in a Later configuration
If they put this into the game and dont give us the montanas im going to be annoyed…
relax, take it easy
eventually they’ll be added
Its funny that i even care considering i’m nowhere near the iowa atm lol
they wont, but im hoping this opens the door for paper tanks again lol
Old cdk modelling was of 1944 version, but idk if those old modelling still exist
A150’s 51cm guns were built.
was the Hull layed down tho?
because that’s the ONLY thing we need to get it added
No, and the devs have never once said they’re even considering adding A-150 at the time of writing. OP just got fooled by Gaijin’s “passed to developers” chaff and decided to post a lie on the forum, then didn’t correct it.
As it stands, all we have to go on is precedent. Every single ship that has been added to the game since naval came out had at least part of the hull built. A-150 did not. The only reason it was accepted as a suggestion is because those guidelines are different and allow for ships that had any unique part of it built. In this case, it was the guns.
4 Likes