Not true, but I included the CM34 since it is near identical to many western designs. It’s engine is on the weaker side but it still outruns the QN with ease on any terrain.
Yeah no, that’s why I compared it to the ZBD04A. It’s an IFV at the same exact BR and roughly represents performance you should expect from a light tank here, and it destroys the QN in both mobility and firepower.
The frontal ERA doesn’t do anything though technically it is effective against HEAT, if you are playing the QN properly you don’t get even shot there unless the enemy brought in a recoilless rifle or something.
It’s also not really fair to compare the QN506 to those either
The main killing weapon of the QN506 is its gun, not the missiles
It’s a lot more compareable to a much slower tracked VBCI or ICV than something like the ZBD04, the Bradley or BMP-2M
Comparing it to the PUMA or Namer is also not really that fair either because it lacks the ammo count and armor protection that those vehicles have while still somehow being slower than them
I think the ZBD04 is the best comparison. It’s autocannon is identical and so is the ammo, both vehicles even have the same ability to quickly switch belts. The secondary weapons are completely different though because the QN is a freak
I believe his price on the exchange can prove why he is at 10.0 and not a higher BR
(As the ultimate reward for land vehicles in the assembly activity, has remained below 50Gjn even after three years)
