I already know the answer but I wanna hear the copes
Overall, they come close in performance (NF-5A has a slight edge), but the NF-5A performs significantly better where it actually matters (dogfight). It has the same A2A armament and double CM.
Go on, say “mUh rAdaR”, and before someone even dares to mention the ballistic computer—first, it doesn’t matter in air battles, and second, it’s bugged and doesn’t even work on the F5-E.
Either F5-E goes down to 10.7 or NF-5A goes to 11.0
Isn’t the J-7D also at 10.7 with a significantly better missile complement and CMs? F-5E deserves to go down to 10.7 or something similar
I agree, the J-7D is OP
I think it would probably be healthier to instead of compressing the BRs to instead move the J-7D and NF-5A to 11.0
The NF-5A is very blatantly undertiered at 10.7, alongside the J-7D and ROC F-5A. Blame Gaijin for putting it at 10.7 despite it not being much worse than the F-5E, and blame Gaijin again for BR compression.
Oh we’re blaming gaijin for all this mess alright, but agreed all three should stay together somewhat
Cuz premium
snail wants their valuable customers))) to get some advantages over tech tree peasants
better compare it to f-5a (thai or american), the comparison will be even wilder
All F-5s are in a desperate need for a good round of nerfing (FM is too good and their engines dont produce any heat)
EEGS is an advantage the F-5E but does seem to have equal AAM. So yes, Should be 11.0 compared to most 10.7s
F-5E would be extremely strong/overpowered again at 10.7.
wait until you see that F-5E and MiG-23MLD are the same BR in sim for some reason (and F-4E is 2 steps lower for some reason too)
That’s just soviet mains being bad at the game / Devs making sure soviets are OP. based upon the BR of several aircraft in SB, the Mig-23MLD could easily be 12.0
