Why is the bmp3 9.0


EDIT: Didn’t even have to check statshark rofl

5 Likes

have*

✅yup

USA mains complain the most generally

4 Likes

It’s not that good either
30mm beanbag launcher with a 20+ second reload on it’s ATGMs

wow
much OP

the only standout things about it are adjustable suspension making it a Russian tank with gun depression(!) and high gen thermals.

2 Likes

this one is sweden main

1 Like

who

the OP

Not even generally just a fact, go through the forum catalogue its 80% crying about russia and aside from the kh38 its just bs. Same people that defended the f14 for years.

2 Likes

f14 suffers now😢

1 Like

Ya just like the mig29, except mig 29 was never clubbing with arh against people that never seen it or had the same capability. If US wasnt so overplayed that gaijin has to force them on both sides in the MM the f14 would have an insane winrate before it was powercrept to dust.

Yes i understand it wasnt hard to notch pheonixes, but most players never learned and still havent, if only 1 side had america then every match would be 16v10 or whatever before the merge happened.

Also the mig29 was going to have r73 at launch until americans cried in thousands of posts to remove it before the update came out.

4 Likes

A should get 9L, B should get 9M, iriaf can get r73

2 Likes

BMP-3 could go to 9.3 and it’d be just fine. Be grateful it didn’t get the full BR raising it actually deserves.

1 Like

The issue is that the other way to balance is based on how the devs feel. We have seen how that works.

I do noticed that recently they added several features which I believed it weren’t there before, the T-55AMD can now replenish its APS charges at the objective points, and then it also has some kind of warning system like the LWS.

2 Likes

Because Russia has lots of OP vehicles.

1 Like

US has lots of OP vehicles and we don’t see same level of complaining.

That’s because the U.S. does infact not have lots of OP vehicles.

3 Likes

elaborate

It fell victim to its own trick, powercreep.

4 Likes