Player problem, not aircraft one,…
That’s also why the game balance is broken currently, because Gaijin Algorithm is based on in game results and not aircraft performances/weaponnary
Player problem, not aircraft one,…
That’s also why the game balance is broken currently, because Gaijin Algorithm is based on in game results and not aircraft performances/weaponnary
it seems like you’re the one coping flying attackers only 😉👍
hence why f-5s still thrive, because people still haven’t learnt that thing they said about “do not dogfight zeroes, run away from them”. But yeah, it’s a cope post, the f-5e is SOOO op, it should go back to 11.0 to fight j7e daily and face r27er’s with just 20 chaff pops and two aim9j’s against six plus all aspect missiles and doppler radars. A plane that gets toyed by the MiG19S should go 11.0.
Two of some of the best A2A guns in the game = mediocre…apparently.
the best a2a guns, you mean vulcan and gsh30-1? i’ve never lost to an f-5 most of the times because the times they managed to land shots on me I didn’t get enough damage to actually stop me from winning the dogfight.
“Some of the best”, meaning up there with guns like the vulcan.
Meaning you were up against players who missed almost all of their shots.
I’m confused, are you coping about the J35 premium of the F-5E?
(It’s cope regardless tho, keep up the streak ))))))
Looks inside forums
Mantis
Goes back to sleep
no, the m39s do literally a whole bunch of nothing. As far as receiving and giving experience of mine goes.
git gud before daring to say “cope” to someone better than you then talk about coping
look player card
see awful stats
question what’s in the mind of bad players to even criticize
feel better about myself and leave
you even played them in ground rb where it’s dummy easy to score kills
that still points out how much of a coper you are.
sure thing, keep mirroring.
I may be ass stat wise (I don’t care for stats) but I can still tell when someone has a take worse than one from the 6th.
you are really comparing me to the ceres guy?
how is my take “worse” when i do have the experience everyone in this thread lacks to even talk about it EVEN despite i posted proofing? are these people still turn fighting zeroes?
i want what ur on since you said the M39s are worse than the literal squirt gun called the GsH-23-2
Your takes in general arent as bad as it may seem, you do have some good ideas but the way you bring them forward is generally not tought out too well and superbly rash and borderline 2014 edgy.
sorry but that’s just it
i agree mantis is a scheisser and the j35 is a paper plane
look how i one tap this j35xs from 2km away, m39>r27er
I think saying that everyone in this thread “lacks experience” is a rather large exaggeration.
This is just an assumption but I’m guessing at least everyone here, including you and me have fought/played either F-5E or J35XS (or both).
Everyone here, including me are replying from our in game experience when it comes to fighting/playing both.
And personally I will still stick with my opinion that F-5E is a much more competent plane than 35XS at 10.7 and even 11.0.
12 flares is a struggle at 10.7, let alone 11.0. That doesn’t make 35XS bad my any means but god do I want to forget spading the 23M.
Also, proof that something is “better” general performance wise (not including player performance) is kinda meaningless imo, you have things like F-16A that out preform MiG-29SMT 9.19R FM wise, doesn’t mean it should be the same br or higher
But that’s just my take on this whole slop thread.