at least someone has said it, there are some things that are clearly pressing issues, and that need to be given some priority, meanwhile, the issue with the crusader tanks that gaijin decides to fix is this…
and Gaijin expects players to react like: omg gaijin the smoke grenades count went up from 26 to 29??? wow! what a massive issue! thank you for fixing this pressing issue so quickly! bruh… come on gaijin fix things that are actually important. increasing the smoke grenade count by 3 didn’t improve the tank whatsoever.
Oh yeah there’s that one too, a lot of things wrong with the Crusaders and the 1 thing gaijin decides to fix, is to give it 3 more smoke grenades. such a game changer!
But i mean, they’re already in the game, and the devs had everything they needed handed to them on a silver platter by the community, so there’s really nothing stopping them from fixing the tank.
The Typhoon still has a number of bug reports like its missing UV filter or a squished HUD that were reported more than a year ago, I think the UV filter was even reported on the first dev server. Neither have been fixed yet and thats a top tier vehicle that is “FOMO” for 3 nations.
A low BR tank, that is only Britian… It will be at the bottom of the pile. CR is in the same place with the ready rack or spall liners
The worst part is that someone reminded me that way back in the day, they started to apply the corrections on the Crusader tanks, but them for some reason not only they reverted it all back, but they left it worse than it was before.
There’s also this report I’ve done. Over a year old and not even accepted. The turret ring incorrectly shares the same armour zone as the turret floor, it should also be at least 14mm thick.
I’m just assuming the external section of the turret ring (before the teeth). Which is roughly equal to the top of the hull double stacked. Top of the hull is 7mm, so times two is 14mm. That being said, I don’t know how Gaijin grab their turret ring values so it could be way thicker going off this diagram.
I remanber that from my old account, back when the crusader 2 was 2.3 the driver’s hatch armor was actually more accurate, but not only they reverted the change, but bumped the tank up to 2.7 without fixing it’s armor, if this isn’t bias i don’t know what it is
That’s not true, they’re updating the model of the T-50 light tank, the T-50 out of all things, a vehicle that has absolutely nothing relevant wrong with it’s armor, unlike the Crusader II and variants.
I do think a big part of that is the new one they are adding as a premium(even tho the last 5, I think, Finnish vehicles were also premium and it should have been tech-tree), this update.
But like i said in the post, part of the vehicle’s affected by these armor issues are premium. Which make even less sense, why it hasn’t been fixed, a premium product that you need to pay for should not have a lot of considerable issues with it.
The Crusader Mk. II “The saint” from Great Britain’s starter pack
And the Crusader AA Mk. II (Overlord) from the Echoes of Overlord pack!
