Yeah, yeah, i know :|
But i mean, they’re already in the game, and the devs had everything they needed handed to them on a silver platter by the community, so there’s really nothing stopping them from fixing the tank.
The Typhoon still has a number of bug reports like its missing UV filter or a squished HUD that were reported more than a year ago, I think the UV filter was even reported on the first dev server. Neither have been fixed yet and thats a top tier vehicle that is “FOMO” for 3 nations.
A low BR tank, that is only Britian… It will be at the bottom of the pile. CR is in the same place with the ready rack or spall liners
Be glad it’s not French - straight to 12.7
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
7 Likes
The worst part is that someone reminded me that way back in the day, they started to apply the corrections on the Crusader tanks, but them for some reason not only they reverted it all back, but they left it worse than it was before.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ncUwovFT6PnL
There’s also this report I’ve done. Over a year old and not even accepted. The turret ring incorrectly shares the same armour zone as the turret floor, it should also be at least 14mm thick.
I’m just assuming the external section of the turret ring (before the teeth). Which is roughly equal to the top of the hull double stacked. Top of the hull is 7mm, so times two is 14mm. That being said, I don’t know how Gaijin grab their turret ring values so it could be way thicker going off this diagram.
2 Likes
I remanber that from my old account, back when the crusader 2 was 2.3 the driver’s hatch armor was actually more accurate, but not only they reverted the change, but bumped the tank up to 2.7 without fixing it’s armor, if this isn’t bias i don’t know what it is
gaijin dont care about ww2 no more
That’s not true, they’re updating the model of the T-50 light tank, the T-50 out of all things, a vehicle that has absolutely nothing relevant wrong with it’s armor, unlike the Crusader II and variants.
I do think a big part of that is the new one they are adding as a premium(even tho the last 5, I think, Finnish vehicles were also premium and it should have been tech-tree), this update.
But like i said in the post, part of the vehicle’s affected by these armor issues are premium. Which make even less sense, why it hasn’t been fixed, a premium product that you need to pay for should not have a lot of considerable issues with it.
- The Crusader Mk. II “The saint” from Great Britain’s starter pack
- And the Crusader AA Mk. II (Overlord) from the Echoes of Overlord pack!
Here’s your answer.
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
At least there’s one in the french tree too
Yes, that’s why i’m making it so explicit that part of the tanks affected are premium tanks
yeah but the bug is old hasnt effected there sales no one notices no one cares
until they can steal our boat.
2 Likes
Yeah, myself and others had Crusader reports that got actioned on the old forum. Then I’m guessing someone counter-reported with bad sources and made them worse. It’s basically what happened with the Cromwell for years. We got the turret armour fixed. People counter-reported and got it nerfed, then we got it fixed again.
1 Like
i’m making people notice, my brother already gave up on buying the British starter pack, because i warned him about it, you better just play the tt Crusader for free.
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yoGfSO4P1iMk
This is Nathan’s repost of my original report, there’s about a dozen British vehicles still missing the rear smoke dischargers (3 of these are Crusaders). Over 8 years old.
Screenshots from my Crusader Mk II armour reports, also over 8 years now. The ones BigGun have linked are reposts.
2 Likes