Biene, and no Rank II.
Crazy.
1 Like
Now we have premiun and TT variant fot the Puma they should do the same with the 234/4.
And of course change his role to ligh tank with scouting instead of TD just like Hellcat but is Germany…
3 Likes
Absolutely. With 3.7 it should be rank III and the issue would be fixed.
Another fix would be to put the “Pakwagen” into the tech tree. These were quite numerous standard units, back then, no special prototypes or whatever to justify to make them super rare premiums.
11 Likes
OK Waylon Smithers.
1 Like
I made one vehicle suggestion that would fit perfectly with Germany Rank 3 light tank.
It’s been almost a month now since it went Pending…
1 Like
Didnt know it was build, or at least partially?
It’s possible seeing both he hull and turret existed, just that by the time this was thought up, the 5cm was so outdated the idea was scrapped completely.
Then again this wouldn’t solve much, because it’s just a puma’s turret on a panzer 2L hull, which is gonna be a slower puma, with tracks.
That makes neither unique for this vehicle.
The Puma has a high top speed, but it lacks agility in tight turns and has a large, very noticeable hull. On the other hand, the Luchs has a much smaller hull, making it excellent at hiding and playing hide-and-seek. And, thanks to its tracks, it surpasses the Puma in both hill-climbing ability and turning radius.
I normally play at BR 5.7–6.0 using the Pz.Sfl.Ic. Aside from gun depression and reload speed, I find the Luchs easier to handle than the Puma. The 5cm-Luchs is almost the same size as the Pz.Sfl.Ic, but it features improved reload time and better gun depression, plus smoke launchers and a machine gun as added bonuses.
There’s no doubt that it makes a superior scout tank compared to the Puma.
Except for the fact that 5 cm-Luchs production was canceled, all the necessary parts are available, so it should meet the implementation criteria.
The exact structure of the Ostwind II remains unclear, the Kikka was originally supposed to be unarmed, the flight performance of the J7W1 and XP-55 is about 80% fabricated, and there are other weapons in this game with questionable credibility, such as the NS-45 APHE and the HO-RI.
Besides, War Thunder has a stance that allows for some degree of fabrication for the sake of balance adjustment. Please consider this positively.
I wont concidder anything until the suggestion isnt public, set by the Moderators.
1 Like
Yes, I agree.
Compared to my semi-fictional Luchs, I think it would be better to either move the two Pumas up to Rank 3, or go with the 7.5 cm Selbstfahrlafette L/41 Modell 2 that you suggested.
I don’t like playing devil’s advocate very often, but I am getting rather tired by how people keep thinking the Soyuz is mostly fabricated. It is not. The ship was laid down (3, actually), the armour scheme in game follows actual blueprints, and at least some guns were manufactured and test-fired.
Arguably the Kronstadt is more fantasy since its original 305 guns were never manufactured.
1 Like
I’m not very familiar with naval ships, so I didn’t realize armored blueprints existed.
I’m a bit embarrassed about that. I’ll replace it with Ho-Ri which has been receiving quite a lot of criticism from the Japanese community. Thank you for pointing it out.
Exactly, it would pretty much be this thing (but slightly better)
1 Like
I’ve been using the Pz.Sfl.Ic along with the Sd.Kfz.234/2 in GRB at BR 5.7 to 6.7. It feels pretty decent and usable, especially when I hide it in the grass. It blends in almost like a ghillie suit.
It’s like they took the ASU-57, nerfed its gun penetration a bit, and just gave it a turret instead.
2 Likes