Why doesn't Italy get Romanian ship again?

So this is another precedent with Gaijin adding Romanian ship to the Soviet TT in the captured form instead of Italy, where Romania is located.

Lyogkiy served in Soviet Union for only a year, why don’t we get NMS Mărășești at the same time?

We still haven’t received the original version of NMS Regina Maria btw, she is only seized in the Soviet TT as Letuchiy trophy…

Should Italy get NMS Mărășești this update?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
7 Likes

We need more Romanian ships for Italy and some Hungarian ones too. But I do agree they should add this ship to the Italian tech tree as the way it was when it was with Romania (if there were any changes when it was given to the USS4)

1 Like

Compared to Aquila this version of the Vifor class destroyer seems to at least have the post first world war armament layout vs Aquila in her scout cruiser configuration (gaijin damnit re-rate it a cruiser, she’s listed as 1917 & the Italians called it a cruiser then).

Logically the Vifor class destroyer should be in the Italian tree as like the Regele Ferdinand class destroyer which also should be in the Italian tree, nothing has been changed from Romanian service to how they’re represented in the Soviet tree.

To bad this Lyogkiy couldn’t be the older Imperial Russian Leytenant Burakovclass destroyer from 1905 (ohh but not that would mean modelling something unique) or the much later Project 1135.3 Frigate of the same name.