Than*
Its a programmed round what is so hard for you gasp about that
Pfft, my mistake how could I have not even noticed that! I am so terribly sorry my original gangster for not being a native speaker, I’ve only been speaking British English for 10 years my dear fellow.
the density of DM53 its much bigger together with being much longer, dont you think that makes a difference?
Then drop it.
They even lack anti era which is selling point of DM53 well i guess gaijin well know that who gonna be suffer the most if it get anti era
The type 10 is going far faster and under more pressure as well when fired
So is the XM25 CDTE… And?
so? you dont know that russian has smaller DFP, better ap defense performance of canno breech and has side ERA?
1 Like
Drop what, your tiny balls?
1 Like
Good now put it together slowly.
Ahh thank you for that
the pressure allows for faster shot, yes but DM53 does not stay behind in pressure and even has a much heavier and longer penetrator than type 10 what part of that you dont understand?
You are so awfully welcome sweetie, might I intrest you in some salt?
Where in your source does it say the type 10 round performs worse then the dm53 i will wait because its not actually in your source that you gave
My question is… is DM53 AESA?
Nay you got plently of it yourself buttercup
What are the pentetrators ?
According to?
DM53s is a 5kg KE that’s fired at 1750m/s with dimensions being 685x22.4mm (density of 18.5g/cc).
Type 10 is a 4.2kg KE that’s fired at 1780m/s (this isn’t a whole lot faster btw), with dimensions of 620x24mm (diameter is largely irrelevant when it comes to the depth of penetration).
DM53 packs a whole lot more kinetic energy than Type 10.
So far you’ve thrown out claims that Type 10 must be better, but you haven’t backed up said claims with any evidence, as such, sources - now.
1 Like
Where is your source for that what are the penetrators made out of