Merkava has better hull armor and can reload faster.
It also gets LRF/LWS, thermals, better reverse speed, gun handling, gun depression and smoke grenades with roof MG.
It’s still a reskin of the APDS round.
And what’s OP about 2.0 K/D ?
Merkava has better hull armor and can reload faster.
It also gets LRF/LWS, thermals, better reverse speed, gun handling, gun depression and smoke grenades with roof MG.
It’s still a reskin of the APDS round.
And what’s OP about 2.0 K/D ?
Most 7.7s can pen it frontally wdym lol, a T-62 would still have to compete with other 8.3s while worrying about getting slammed by HEAT-FS by lower BR vehicles
Maybe stop playing the Wiesel 1A4
The T-62 doesn’t do anything better than the current 8.3s. It would be absolutely fine.
Consistent 2.0 kd is pretty good wdym it means u doing well
But what’s so special about it ?
I have 4.9 K/D and 4.1 K/D in Gal Batash and Merkava respectively.
Are they crazy busted as well ?
Sure
Ik merkava is very strong at downtiers cuz the engine eats everything
Gal batash is also great
Only reason both dont go up cuz the mobilty and armor is hella bad against apfsds from 9.3 and above
In general israel 9.3 is very good
Show me where a T32/E1 can penetrate it w/o loading APCR.
I’m not going to continue arguing with you, as you clearly do not understand the points i’m presenting.
U right
Just look overall stats and winrate
T62 and t55 does well
Yeah the T-62 isn’t bad at 8.7, its just slightly worse than other Soviet 8.7’s.
I dont think its worse then most 8.7 but sure
Sorry, meant its Soviet peers.
Oh yea the obj smt is better cuz mobility
Also who even plays the T32 when the M103 is the same BR
Yeah the T-62 isn’t bad at 8.7, its just slightly worse than other Soviet 8.7’s.
You mean straight worse and significantly worse than other nations 8.7s.
T-62 is one of the worse 8.7s.
Look where the T32 can penetrate the T-62, now look when the roles are reversed. Keep in mind there is no limit to how many 8.3’s you can face in a 7.7. 7.3 Vehicles DO NOT need to face more 8.3’s.
Also, the T-62 is stabilized. Stuff like the T95E1 would be the same BR.
It isn’t worthy of going down to 8.3. That BR area is compressed enough.
It isn’t worthy of going down to 8.3.
It is though, and specious comparisons using some of the worst performing vehicles of that bracket don’t change the fact.
I’ll reiterate my point one last time. We don’t need to push mediocre vehicles down into a highly compressed area. We do need however, some decompression. That will actually solve this issue,
I wonder if it has anything to do with 8.7 being the dual plane stabilized intro to mbt’s in general?