Why does the T-62 exist at 8.7?

I found it pretty decent to be honest, but when i got the 435 which is better in basically every way, i found no use for it. Especially with the other 8.7 MBT’s you get with USSR its pretty obsolete at 8.7

Wouldn’t this alone justify looking into a downtier

It is good as other 8.7 and it is slightly better then t55
U have a bit less then 1.5 kd its normal
Also as i said in this br u get alot kf downtiers anyway
Its good tank

Such as?

Not by enough to warrant a BR increase

No t62 has fine turret armor even against some heat and early apfsds it can take some
Also better mobility and low profile

And in downtier ur armor is even better when shot it pretty much the same like even t54 can pen u easily

1 Like

No it can’t as it’s lolpen even for 90mm HEAT. You’ve been lied to.

50 vs 48
8 vs 11
15.7 HP/t vs 13.9 HP/t

That’s about it for mobility.

Yes, you’re trading half a dozen things for an ability to have better armor against conventional AP rounds that aren’t even that common at 7.7.
Gimel has ERA which can stop 105mm HEAT, let alone 90mm one. It can even help you against some early ATGMs.

1 Like

Volume metric my guy
1.8 hp/t is nit a small diffrance
And the low profile is also a big advantge

Shot gimel is better but not by match
In full downtier i will take the t62 in full uptier the shot kal
And u get alot of downtiers

1 Like

I never looked at T-62 as a volumetric hell, you got any evidence for that ?

Gimel is definitely 0.3 BR better than T-62, as the latter’s advantages mostly lie in being shot at by WW2 rounds lol.

1 Like

No, the T62’s turret armor is worse, its easier to pen it with 7.7 French solid shot than to pen t55s.

1 Like

Doesnt make any sanse the armor value is better

1 Like

Played that yestarday and i won 3v1 against 2 leos and shot kal or strv
Both leos shot at me and did nothing one has heat im pretty sure

Not true

Listen if t62 was underperforming then gaijin would have allready make it 8.3

Good job, doesn’t really prove anything though.

I don’t think you of all people should go this route, seeing how upset you get over Merkavas and Namers being at their respective BRs.

1 Like

not really how that works, is it?

2 Likes

U did not just said that lol
U rly think merkava is 12.0 metirial?
Peper armor against leo 2a7 sure
And namer is a joke

It kinda is tho

Gaijin has never left something at the wrong BR for too long?

1 Like

Well I’m just showing you how funny that “argument” sounds.
Listen, if Merkavas/Namers were underperforming then Gaijin would’ve already lowered their BR.

They even pushed Namer to 11.3 lmao.

1 Like

He didn’t say he agrees with it, he said you don’t agree with their BRs being what they are now yet you say gaijin must have it right here because… well … they must have it right!

1 Like

Yea and its stupid cuz it was underperforming its a rare case
Also gaijin has some anti israel bias which we all know why
Thats why israel stuck with no spaa for years all tho there is so much ez options to add and ofc merkava is oppsite of what it is irl
Meanwhile russian mbts are overperforming in all brs and spaa as well
as i said i didnt playes a single bad t series tank for now
Russian bias is real and clear

Namer is a rare case and everyone was suprised when it moved up for a reason
Try to play it i dare u

Mistakes happends
And i dont think gaijin even looked at the namer stats cuz it went up very quickly
Mark my words its gonna be downtierd back like the chapparal