And you’re free to those opinions. But i personally feel like they are unnecessary to the discussion and topic.

( FAQ - War Thunder — official forum )
Even the Swedish A21 versions recently got it’s fuel tanks added.
And you’re free to those opinions. But i personally feel like they are unnecessary to the discussion and topic.

( FAQ - War Thunder — official forum )
Even the Swedish A21 versions recently got it’s fuel tanks added.
I asked Gaijin Support about this, my friend. I don’t know what would be configured in the bug report and how they would view it. If you could help me, I would appreciate it, and it would bring more realism to the game. Besides, I have proof and sources!

We can find a section of the A4 flight manual which states that “in the event of landing gear failure without two external fuel tanks installed, ejection is mandatory.”
Actually, A21s have had them “bolted” by default before recent changes. In fact, it used to be one of those external defining features of A21A when it comes to distinguishing it from J21As.
So yeah, it is just that devs now separated these fuel tanks from the complete model of A21A. It is not that they added them. They simply made them removable (which is honestly good as those kind of made flight performance worse with unnecessary extra fuel you would never use anyway)
what you think its me that started this ??
simply saying that wont bring nothing is bad and its my fault.
i really hope you read the convo
I haven’t said that. at all.
Realistic players need to understand: simulation players appreciate historical elements and aesthetics, because in SB (Surface Simulation) what matters most is situational awareness and maximizing the use of aircraft, while in RB (Radio Simulation) less historical elements are used to take advantage of better equipment.
I only said that because you criticized my simple opinion and presented yours as superior. In Brazil there’s a saying, “He who speaks what he wants, hears what he doesn’t want.”
that make sense, first thing that come to you head is acting violent.
said simple words, you got offended. i gave a clear explanation, still putting in on me.
if you got offended by these simple word, maybe the forum is not the right place to be.
while we are talking about a saying, here is north america there is a saying where someone who get offended by simple word is offended by everything and ashamed of nothing.
cherry on top of the cake, playing the victim card
Maybe I didn’t want anyone’s opinion because I already had all the historical facts on the table. I was looking for a solution, and how could I request something so simple from the game? Literally a tank that already exists on several fighter jets in the game, just apply it to the A4. But people always look out for themselves. I appreciate the American saying! But there’s a Brazilian one that’s even better: A dog that barks a lot doesn’t bite.
says a lot about you.
oh my, creating a discussion who can people talk on it just to say i didnt want all this because i already got it. holy shit dude its just keep getting worse.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/
know better before going all victim and getting offended.
It’s not wrong to return the favor, besides, this won’t lead anywhere. I’m not going to come over there and argue with you, just like you don’t come to me. It’s better if this dies down.
good, This is going to nowhere
I’m talking about the debate regarding who is right, not about the A-4.
Still odd how fuel tanks are so scare
It COULD be napalm and fyi I do use them
I didn’t understand, did you say that the tanks in the photo might be napalm E, or did you say that you use napalm to make them look like tanks?
The Swedes tested napalm in drop tanks
Ahhhh okay