R-27ER could be in game but NATO should get AIM-7P2 which is the closest missile similar to 27ER
LOL! No it doesn’t. R-27ER is inferior to advanced ARHs.
Range at 12km isn’t everything.
Maybe i’m wrong but counter to AIM-120A was R-27EA
i like the mig23 mla tho and i think its a good addition because of how differantly it flys compared to mig29s
No they gain more money by forcing players off of trees like german because its one of the most played nations and forcing them to buy new premiums in other tech trees
thats exactly what happend with me too when i saw that russia got the mig29 and germany didnt i went and bought the su11 to grind out russia but as soon as i reached the russian mig29 the german one was released so i abandoned it
“Analysis still shows the R-27ER beating the AIM-120C by 4 second but only 0.6 nm more of separation this time”
It’s not much inferior to the AIM-120s and other missiles alike.
1 Like
not really because it gets uptierd every game and faces the top of the line f4s that are superior in every single thing except menuverability
Just cause you chose to unlock another tech tree doesn’t mean your fictions are reality.
Separate your fictions from reality, it’s really not a conspiracy, Alex Jones.
If i remember first aims-120 wasn’t really good, B variant was step forward.
1 Like
yea ofc its inferiour but it can still fight with them just fine like for example it can out maneuver and accelerate the aimmrams so that can help it out alot in different scenarios
exactly
its not a fiction thing alot a ton of people do it and im not hte only special case im just giving my exp as a example im sure theres a ton of others who had the same thing
also gaijin already had the 9.12 model and the 9.13 model is the exact same just with a diffrent skin so they could have released it with the mig29smt but they didnt i wonder why
9.12A and 9.13 are not the same dude
1 Like
model wise in game there the exact same im talking form a development procces point i work on 3d models and texturing ik for a fact that the in game models are the exact same just with differant textures and sounds maybe
the planes irl are not hte same yes ik but im talking from a developers point
People adopting new tech trees doesn’t mean people are being forced to.
9.12 & 9.13 use separate models; and having the model doesn’t mean you have the animations, subsystems, cockpit, etc completed.
29SMT is also an entirely different aircraft.
If 9.12 was finished before 9.13, Gaijin probably wouldn’t have added 9.13.
Thanks for confirming to us that you don’t work on 3D modeling & textures, cause you failed the simplest of tests of distinguishing the differences between 9.12, 9.13, and 9.19.
Hump behind cockpit is different, but i will check it in game rn and send pic here
yea see there extremely small detail that i know for a fact the gaijins team are pros and can easily do this in 1 day if not a week considering they got other sutff todo
the 12 and 13 are literally the same 3D model but with minor differences
oh and the 9.12A and 9.12G are the same
Yes there are because 9.12G if i can call it that way had small changes comparing to original 9.12A. On this screen you can see all changes
1 Like
non of these impact the in game 3D model
they will impact the texture sure but not the 3d model