Why can't NATO have a well armored MBT?

Nobody knows who that russian is besides people who read obscure facts about random russians.

Just because you lack knowledge doesn’t mean we also do, if you got nothing to contribute please stop wasting my time on this subject.

Just because you have knowledge doesn’t mean 99% of the world does. You have zero reason to believe he is named after this russian rather than the multiple other things he could be referencing that have FAR more cultural relevance.

1 Like

Do you have concrete proof that 99 percent of the people doesnt know him, especially people who sticks on a game site where its based on historical events and vehicles? If you dont i sugges stop making empty claims.

Never said he did it on purpose, i just pointed that his nickname also tied to that guy which is real, if you cant even comprehend what you’re reading then its your problem not mine.

Do you have any proof that legitimately even 0.1% of the world knows about him?

“lolicon” has exactly 1 connotation. “motorola” is a cellphone company to 99.99% of the planet. Even if you DID know about said russian guy, you should STILL assume he is named after the cellphone company until proven otherwise.

1 Like

Now write an email to Motorola saying they should change their name because some commander is using it.

1 Like

Thats why i dont make absurd claims like you and say ‘’ oh 99 percent of the people doesnt know this guy’'.

I dont have to assume anything in this case.

I can assume whatever i want in this case and even then i just only pointed out his nickname tied to that certain guy, didnt even blamed him in the first place.

Its just you got inferior complexes so you just straight jumped into conversation without even comprehending whats going on in the first place.

You can do that, i couldnt care less tbh.

But it seems i touched a nerve.

You surely have been hanging out with serious snowflakes if you think this struck my nerve.
I guess your nickname is also very bad, as it is tied to a tank that Nazi Germany used to commit so many atrocities.

1 Like

Getting fancy aren’t we? Sadly couldn’t care less.

Now that’s that pathetic and made me laugh so hard, imaging trying to tie my name to a tank that was used during WWII and fought against its enemies while your nickname directly tied to a person who tortures and kills civillians/POWS. It shows you got really offended and has a temper of snowflake but have it your way and assume that my name is also carries same intentions.

Bait use to be believable.

Anyway i think im done with this conversations and realized you love to judge other people’s squadron or personal names while cant stand with it when it happens to you.

Sadly. Expecially since IRL proves otherwise.

1 Like

We should be asking why NATO doesn’t have anti-ERA APFSDS in game yet

Because it would basically render any ERA obsolete at any distance unless its Relikt.

I think the devs openly admitted on various occasions that they nerf things on tanks knowingly to keep them more balanced in game. right? Pretty stupid tho that they turn blind sight on Chinese and Russian tanks. For example, there was literally no need to reduce engine HP on King Tigers, they are already pretty sluggish but devs still did it for some reason and they are so annoying to play now

Oh yeah, Chinese tanks are epitome of strong.
Said no one ever.

NATO MBT armors are trash.

Imo, on purpose.

Not epitome but they follow the same tank philosophy as the Russians

1 Like

So they are too strong ?

So they must be even better than Russian tanks considering they have better reverse speed right, righttttt?/s

Yes, they’re actually are. And that’s the reason why Russia + China have 80-90% winrate in sim battle btw.

Also the reason why russian winrates in GRB are lowered a bit : because sometimes, they do fight against China. So they suffer a bit (actually facing something strong, not like the crappy NATO MBTs we have).

All eastern vehicles are artificially/shadow buffed, duh.