Why can't NATO have a well armored MBT?

Thanks maybe you should post all this stuff you’ve found create a new topic and let more people see it might help open a lot of people eyes (i’m not really good with some coding )

We can spread the word, but the russian and gaijin shills will just spam report it like they always do to have it “hidden” because they can’t handle when the truth gets out.

2 Likes

Who know when people see it and a lot of people start to question and gaijin can’t answer that it might force gaijin to change we did it before about economic which now getting better I’ll support you

Just pop these on one of the Challys 2 topics, it will gather some views

Link me to one you think would like to see it, I would love to share it.

https://forum.warthunder.com/t/challenger-2-mbt-technical-data-and-discussion/20371/54
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/fixing-the-tes-with-all-available-research/7137/23
I would say these 2 are the best to post on rn

3 Likes

you explained that well. as a reference you can call the sim with the 3 letters. there the F-16C is really a F-16C with everything that belongs to it and the Migs are only Migs.

1 Like

“leopard_2a5_turret_nera” is just a general name that Gaijin chose for any NERA armour that isn’t composite screens, it’s actually irrelevant.

2 Likes

It is relevant because it pulls from the other code. Meaning they all act the same, even though they shouldn’t.

2 Likes

I also think that is the case. But given how many modifiers gets put after it makes me quesion why not make new altogether

It is the case… Here is the game code:

image

1 Like

Today i found on my pc folder with unupdated WT 1.83. So i did what most people would do in this situation. I unpacked aces. So i have data from 2018. If you want me to compare any tank from then to now, tall me

Wow, that is really nice. We should compare the new vs the old russian missiles. They feel like they got upgraded.

If you mean AtA, they were not yet in the game. ATGMs and AGMs only

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRoI1s6R1pc
RB:
image
image

https://forum.warthunder.ru/t/pomenyat-punkt-na-true-v-kode-o-sozdanii-vtorichnyh-oskolkov-u-sssr-tankov-t-72-t-80-t-64/18181

Me when I shoot at the BVM or 72B3 in my M1A2 with M829A2 (it should pen) and it nonpens and so I get shot in what should be a protected part of my tank (the turret) and die in one shot

Seriously though Russian tanks feel so disproportionally armored compared to NATO MBTs that I have played, like even as far back as the T-55 it starts doing that where it barely has anywhere to shoot that actually causes damage

2 Likes

how come? i can’t understand Russians and google trans suck

You just don’t miss a beat lol. Anything past 2A7 or SEP v3 is basically fantasy. As fantasy as any other proposed Russian export tank. T-90M with all three major Obr’s, T-72B3M Obr.2022 and 2023, T-80BVM Obr. 2019, 2022, and 2023… Not to mention new production T-80’s starting up in Omsk again, means we likely will get either a completely new T-80, or at least a Obr.2024. T-14, T-15, Kurganets, BMPT Terminator and it’s Obr’s 2022 and 2023.

Then there’s an entire fleet of BMP’s and BMD’s that haven’t been added, let alone Tor M1 and M2, or adding a new T-55AM-1 obr 2023 or T-62M-1 obr 2023 in the mid tree.

But yea “rUssIaN BiAs sO op”

Those vehicles will never happen. The 2A7+ and 2A8 already exist. The next gen Bradley’s (we are missing at least 10 of them) already exist. The next gen STRV 123A and STRV 123B.

Russia isn’t making anything new. They will be lucky to keep what they have operational at this point. Anything they paper napkin dreamt isn’t going to get produced now.

They can’t even produce and get the 2S38 we have in game fully operational, and they have not gone into official service yet. We should stick to reality and not wishful thinking.

2 Likes