Unless the canadian 2A6 gets the same MEXAS package as 2A7V it will hardly do anything for US lineup bar having better flat pen by some 20mm.
If they have the gall make India a subtree of Great Britain, I wouldn’t put it past them to make Canada a subtree of the US
1 Like
I personally don’t think Canada should be a subtree but rather vehicles for nations that need them. German originated vehicles for germany, American originated vehicles for the US and so fourth. Unless it’s domestically produced, that should go to britain.
4 Likes
USA should become UK sub-nation then lmao
Jokes aside, why not just come to both USA and UK tech tree? win-win situation in my eyes.
That’s not a good idea, primarily because that splits the lineups available to play in a match. It becomes impossible to play proper a Canadian lineup if half the vehicles are in one tree, and another half in another.
And adding the same vehicles to both trees is just silly.
3 Likes
Hello
We have no plans for Canadia to be a sub tree of the US. Canadian vehicles can go to whatever nation in game they are most needed in or in specific cases, where that individual vehicle fills a gap or need.
Canadian vehciles will not just be limited to the US tree.
13 Likes
at this point just turn the country in to North American Union. Canada, USA and Mexico.
5 Likes
Canada is a commonwealth realm, along side Australia, and New Zealand. It has every reason to go to the UK tech tree but as smin as said a billion times (you should definitley say it again smin ;)) is that they sadly (and wrongfully) will go to whatever nation needs the vehicles to fill in gaps
4 Likes
No, Canada has vehicles in Britain and Germany. Take a look at this
Britain has the same RAM II and Skink you’ve mentioned so from the start that lack reason.
Britain = 7
US = 4
Germany = 2
1 Like
Preach.
The 2A4M and ADATS fighting one another at top tier is already insulting.
Canada (and Australia & NZ as you say) being treated as a designated gap-filler for any nation that needs it is a practice I wish would end. We belong in the UK tree and I’ll die on that hill.
9 Likes
exactly. our governments see the crown as king (they dont control our government in anyway shape or form, its kind of a formality of sorts) so there is literally 0 reason to not put our countries there.
India, South Africa and many many many other african nations however dont see the crown as their king and are far more seperated from the UK
1 Like
Commonwealth is not a military alliance. Okay, maybe only when Aussies dunk on every other Commonwealth nation in the swimming during the Commonwealth games.
As an Aussie, I personally like seeing Aussie stuff split across US and Brit trees. If anything, I’d have made the ‘Pig’ (F-111C) go to the US tree, instead. So that it’s early Aussie vehicles in British tree, and then later vehicles in the US tree, which is more reflective of our shift to USA as our closest military ally and weapons source.
1 Like
Im tired of people pretending they’re not stupidely good man
1 Like
Canadia?
1 Like
You’re the very first aussie ive seen say anything like this.
2 Likes
I understand, and of course I can only speak for myself as a Canadian and my opinion for Canada’s place in the game and won’t pretend to speak for others.
I’d understand wanting the F-111 and AIM in the same place. Would you enjoy seeing an Aussie Boxer in the German tree?
Yeah, US Mains would have a panic attack if they had to use most nations MBTs
3 Likes
Not Commonwealth of nations… A realm of the Commonwealth. Different things.
2 Likes
Yeah, pretty much. If Australia isn’t getting its own tree, I’d like the more modern vehicles to go to the nation of origin - so mostly USA, few things in German tree, older jets in French tree and so on. But obviously, they’re using our nations to try plug gaps in others trees, so it won’t go that way.