Seriously why are M1\2 Abrams so weak? They really need higher “Armor Penetration” for it’s Battle Rating the Armor Penetration just needs buffed. There almost like training tanks for other countries for their target practice.
Abrams 0.2 KDR
T-80 0.2 KDR
Leopard 2 0.2 KDR
bro did you use an automation program aka bot?
2 Likes
the m1 i dont like but everything after that isnt too bad. its basically a light tank and not meant to brawl
Eh he’s a controller player, cut him a little bit of slack :P
2 Likes
I havent had any issue with the gun. Are you trying to aim center mass on everything?
And for top tier, i play everything assuming its armor wont hold. Dont expect drive around expecting to block shots.
heh I was mocking people who claim one thing is bad and then you find out they always have the same performance across all the vehicles they played even the ones they indirectly claims is stronger lol
Yee I suck with the controller 🎮 i need da PC
1 Like
Because gaijin devs and their " beliefs " that the U.S Military and General Dynamics have sat back for over 40 years and said " we are just going to allow the russians to be able to penetrate the Lower Front plate with rounds from the 1980s, and not do anything to stop them "
2 Likes
Bruh… I’d love if Gaijin would actually buff the Abrams one of these days
I am most impressed with gaijin’s ability to predict/model spalling inside abrams tanks. It’s clearly accurate since across the board it’s know abrams are designed for crew survivability first then fightability second. The Russians themselves have said how tough the few abrams taken out were. Yet in game every hit severely disables the crew or destroys the tank. The reality, as has been learned from war, is abrams should be as hard to kill as the t80bvm or leo2a7v…and the russian tanks should have the weak spots, fragilility, and crew survivability of current in game abrams.
gaijin somehow thinks theres no spall liner in the tank either or and they dont seem to know what kevlar is.
Well I wouldn’t really call it weak because it requires a higher skill sealing when comparing it to a T90m or 2A7. In other words, it’s a less forgiving tank.
The Abrams has the greatest potential to do a lot of damage because of it’s ROF, mobility and armor, people just need to take advantage of it.
Not saying the Abrams is without it’s flaws. Sure there are some inaccuracies but fixing those isn’t going to make the Abrams “good”. People just need to accept that they can’t play the same way as a 2A7.
What historical war gives rise to this “Abrams is amazing” belief ? Where they been used in like for like combat there have been loses. In what war did the US’s latest and greatest square off against Russia’s latest ? I mean the Gulf war a turkey shoot and Ukraine has seen NATO tanks destroyed in combat ,possibly by Russian tanks.
Seems like the M1s expectation is based on sci fi ,a war that hasn’t happened yet.
I think you could say that about many later MBTs in NATO’s ranks.Even tank commanders put little faith in competitions.
I just feel that there is some great feeling that the M1 is a legendary veteran of major tank conflicts in the same way the M4 was and I really can’t see where people get that from.No such history exists does it ?
All you have is a game and in that game people win top tier with 12 kills in an M1 on a regular basis right? Because we see that on Youtube.
Then we see maybe the same guy do the same thing in a T80, so what is this great unbalance?
1 Like
no U.S army standard tank has been exported, ever Ukraine Abrams are all export variants.