Is that even an existing round IRL?
Type 16 MCV (P) has laser warning system at battle rating 9.3, AMX-30B2 BRENUS has electro-optical active protection system at battle rating 8.7, increase battle rating of those then. Jokes apart; While T-90A and T-80U are similar in a lot of aspects, what makes T-80U a higher battle rating in contrast to the T-90A is the mobility and armor which is better overall. T-90A can easily go up in battle rating, I don’t see an issue with it but the easiest argument in favour of its current battle rating is the gun handling when compared to T-72B3, the values are abysmal for such modern vehicle.
T-90A
T-72B3
then remove 3bm60 and put it at 10,7 like the Bhisma in GBR TT.
dunno, is listed in some sources but not really reliable, 3bm60 is listed as Snivets-2.
hard to believe that USSR has not made new designs since 2010, which is listed for 3bm60.
3BM60 is a 12.0 shell at most, but in reality it’s probably an 11.7 shell currently as long as M1A1 HC stays at 12.0.
Of course there is no BR compression, M1A1 HC could be 12.7 right now, but it can’t cause that’d make it a top BR premium for the two that are premiums, or they could have their M829A2 removed.
Cause M1A1 HCs are actual 12.7 rounds with meta mobility, good armor, & fast reloads.
I mean thats a great example to not place the t90 11.7, the t80u is just a better tank.
why is the 120s has 5s loading with 12.7 rounds and full hd thermals at 10.3? I know your answer will be poor mobility and being ugly tank.
No, it’s pepper hull armor.
1 Like