Y’all need to ignore cofcof, this guy is here for bait purposes to derailnthe conversation.
Stay focused on the topic and block the shill if you need to. But don’t let him derail Y’all.
1 Like
Do you think this is normal?
2 Likes
It’s propaganda. Russia/China etc conflate their hardware to seem more “scary”. Can anyone show me actual footage of reactive armor on a russian mbt, in real world scenarios, stopping apfsds? Everything I have ever seen corresponding to russian mbt’s suggest they are fireworks despite what variety of reactive armor. What we get in the game is all the perceived benefits of russian hardware and none of the weaknesses:
- bmpt…pulled from front line service because it was too heavy and slow to keep up with mbt’s it was supposed to support. It also was proven the exposed fcs were too fragile for modern battlefields. High fire rate prone to overheating and inaccuracy.
- Why is it ONLY russian mbt’s get hull armor upgrades to address current and emerging threats when we know ALL countries upgrade to meet them.l
“all nations are equal but some nations are more equal than others” type shit
I’d have agreed with this some some ago, the Kh-38 was a cartoonish addition to the game but between Spice/Hammers and soon GBU-53s there’s not much to complain about between CAS loadouts. Tri-Seeker JAGM on AH-64s is just as dubious in existence as Kh-38MTs and it’s not complained about at all. The only thing that makes CAS lopsided atm the Pantsir SM SV (another dumb addition).
Win rates are based on games that depend on the players, who generally play very badly.
That’s typical gaijin logic I’ve messed up so badly on the ground that now I have to add an anti-air system to stop everything, but even so, there have been times when I’ve fired 48 JAGMs at the Panstir in 1 minute 30 seconds
GBU-53s are garbage. I played with these bombs. They are useless weapons.
Player skill averages out over a population, also nothing stops a player from swapping between nations freely (bar Israel).
Because they arent lol?
Its almost like these 2 things are connected in some way.
If all players play very badly what is the deciding factor about the win then?
1 Like
Spice 250 too , brimstones too , hammers too , all nato weapons are Garbage because they don’t do Mach 2 I have to use two neurons to control it, and it’s really complicated
I don’t know about the Spice 250, but out of 10 AGU-53s, all of them flew past the target, even when I fired at the target flying purely from top to bottom.
China is the biggest victim in this game; it, along with Israel, are the most wronged nations.
China competes directly with the Russian TT.
just as Israel competes with the American TT
The gaijin hate it when minor nations compete with main nations.
Only those who think China has never played as a Chinese team believe it’s a strong nation in the game.
(in RB)
You need to play a lot with different nations to understand the complexity of balancing, not using KD and win rate as metrics is a start, because I can guarantee that even if you put 16 top-tier Americans in a team together, they wouldn’t make 3 players.
But neither the Spice 250, nor the Hammer, nor the GBU-53 have a speed of Mach 3.
Well, kind of the Tri seeker was tested with the AGM-169, and the JAGM-MR isn’t yet in service.
But this was done to avoid needing to add MMW seekers, and provide an extended range option to the AH-64 since the baseline JAGM still uses a regular hellfire propulsion section.
You didn’t pick up on the irony
What impresses me is that the J15T has positive WR.
edit Now that I’ve seen that in the tank simulation, Abrams and VT4 with 74% WR WTF
He is baiting folks ignore him