People don’t want US, German or Russian vehicle in X tree they want to play vehicles flying the flag of the nation they are interested in.
And in the case of this thread, India has a home so people want that stuff that India operates in the tree it has a home so they can play Indian vehicles.
Sub-trees do a few thing, if it just filling holes the sub-trer system shouldn’t even exist as it’s not needed. See. Canada. As it’s been use to fill multiple holes even without a home.
One of the key part of the sub-tree system is representation. Someone many here seem to think no one outside the big 3 is allowed, despite the fact they enter reason nations the sub-tree system was made was people wanted more nations repented as they where poplar.
More like a Copy + Paste of the MKM, without the MAWS.
That’s fine, I wasn’t taking issue with that, but the fact that someone said that the MKK and MKI derivatives were the same plane because they’re both Su-30s is beyond silly.
Im just not one for claiming a revision is totally different. Its blunt and makes certain autistic plane nerds see red but its not exactly wrong to say it is it?
But the point is, in-game, they will likely play 99.99% the same and will probably be added exclusively as a KH-38MT / KH-31 slinger and basically nothing else.
Much like how Japan got an Su-30 C&P because their top tier CAS was very lacking
That’s fair, Then again, the MKI could get some… weird A2A options like the MICA which India has been trying to integrate that would change the Flanker Playstyle.
But for ground, yes. It would just be a Kh-31/38 slinger.
So, essentially, it will be a straight C&P and be pointless to add, and even IF it does come with those loadout options. I still dont see why it would be needed in the TT