When will the British Air Force tech tree add advanced Indian air combat vehicles?

Apparently I need to tap the sign.

People don’t want US, German or Russian vehicle in X tree they want to play vehicles flying the flag of the nation they are interested in.

And in the case of this thread, India has a home so people want that stuff that India operates in the tree it has a home so they can play Indian vehicles.

Sub-trees do a few thing, if it just filling holes the sub-trer system shouldn’t even exist as it’s not needed. See. Canada. As it’s been use to fill multiple holes even without a home.

One of the key part of the sub-tree system is representation. Someone many here seem to think no one outside the big 3 is allowed, despite the fact they enter reason nations the sub-tree system was made was people wanted more nations repented as they where poplar.

More like a Copy + Paste of the MKM, without the MAWS.

That’s fine, I wasn’t taking issue with that, but the fact that someone said that the MKK and MKI derivatives were the same plane because they’re both Su-30s is beyond silly.

1 Like

I know the differences.

i meant that if it was to come it would be a MKK counterpart rather than a counterpart to the SM, would be the more logical spot for it to appear.

a SU30 is still a SU30 no matter to me, a spitfire Vc and spitfire IXc are still merlin spitfires yaknow?

1 Like

Eh…

Its big, its ugly and it doesnt belong along side Tonkas, Harriers and Jaaaaaaaaaaags.

Its basically the same either way

1 Like

a typhoon is a typhoon. Spitfire a spitfire. Flanker a flanker. move the attribute slider a little and its still cut from the same cloth.

Thank you for explaining, that makes more sense.

This statement struck me as you seeing the MKKs and MKIs as the same plane

Obligatory Jag Photo.

i-guess-bro

Im just not one for claiming a revision is totally different. Its blunt and makes certain autistic plane nerds see red but its not exactly wrong to say it is it?

How the mighty have fallen JLR couldnt have fumbled worse (off topic i know)
image

1 Like

It’s a Ship of Thesueus type of ordeal.

They look similar, But most if not all of the parts are different.

It’s like saying the F-2 is an F-16.

Peak British Sports Cars are never Off Topic.

But the point is, in-game, they will likely play 99.99% the same and will probably be added exclusively as a KH-38MT / KH-31 slinger and basically nothing else.

Much like how Japan got an Su-30 C&P because their top tier CAS was very lacking

imageimage

assram / 20 ir guided bomb / kh31 who you complain all the time about it / derbys / mica / astra.

yes way different, more thrust / weight with more agility.

image

funny you say that… Im not sticking my head out of the trech for that one

Im an MG man, so I understand the pain Jaaaaaag boys are feeling

1 Like

Or R-73 and R-77/R-77-1s and nothing else.

There is 0 gurantee it would come with any of that, and if it does, they I would still prefer to play the EFT with ASRAAM and Meteors.

and I would still take actual Brimstones over those as well.

Same as cockpit as in:

That’s fair, Then again, the MKI could get some… weird A2A options like the MICA which India has been trying to integrate that would change the Flanker Playstyle.

But for ground, yes. It would just be a Kh-31/38 slinger.

This is all just assuming it got those and Gaijin didnt just add it with R-73 and R-77 for 14.0 or something.

Almost none (maybe none tbh) Britains 10.7+ aircraft actually have the best loadout they could get.

if it doesnt come with it, it will simply be a other su30sm which i dont want it that way either.

james-doakes-james

Man, I’ve only ever seen one MG before, but it was so nifty.

So, essentially, it will be a straight C&P and be pointless to add, and even IF it does come with those loadout options. I still dont see why it would be needed in the TT

An MKI at 14.0 would be pure cancer.