That’s the main problem. It revolves around who’s turn is.
F-14A had 6 months uncontested and before it you had 23ML/MLA/MLD 6 months uncontested.
People usually remember the IRIAF with F90s , problem is i played the plane when it became 13.0 , never before, and i’ve seen even Rafale’s and EFs die because they don’t pay attention…and even in BFMs because they underestimate it (they should have been able to toy with it and it has nothing really to do) .
From my experience the higher ranks of Russian ground is flooded with relatively new players that drops the stats on those vehicles.
Like Germany.
Amazingly good vehicles whos stats are deflated by it’s players.
1 Like
That doesn’t really answer my question though.
BVM has a 6.4s reload speed with 3BM60.
Like USA 12.0
no papi
To be entirely fair, that was for a grand total of two weeks.
And it was instantly nerfed.
1 Like
This thread is an absurd cope.
Why don’t you go and play Russia to see for yourself if it is indeed that strong.
2 Likes
I see a lot of Soviet players defending absurdities when their nation has the best vehicles in terms of survival rate, reload speed, protection, and fire prevention system in the game.
I think the only bad thing about Russian MBTs is the low gun depression and the 3 km/h reverse speed lol.
Complicated.
1 Like
…Is this bait?
1 Like
Why would I be lying when I achieved it in the most “skill-less” way possible, just pressing W while playing with premium vehicles and reaching the top tier of the tech tree?
They are simply AMAZING vehicles that don’t require any brainpower to play, and I say the same about the top Russian planes with their R-73 and R-77-1.
Are you playing the same game as me?
Be honest with yourself, you don’t want your nation to be realistic about its vehicles because you know they’re not even 10% of what they show in this game.
They’re scrap metal from the 1960s with minor improvements that are questionable in terms of their actual effectiveness, but anyway… How about putting a grid around your entire tank, restricting the turret’s rotation to the target in front? That way you can survive the artillery.
122A was added in 2020 and is still better than any RU tank in the game.
They have so amazing tanks that you struggle to keep a 1 K/D in them, sounds good.
Your experience with R-73 and R-77-1 planes isn’t much different either, you feed kills to the enemy in your supposedly amazing and easy to play vehicles.
6 Likes
STRVs have the same weaknesses as a Leopard 2A5, WHICH WORK WHEN FIRING AT THESE LOCATIONS AND ACTUALLY ELIMINATE THEM.
Now try firing at the same weak points as the 70/80/90 series and now BMPT, which in THEORY should kill them with one shot…
Clearly, you are living in a dystopian universe, because in favorable circumstances, it will only destroy one crew member, the loading system. HOWEVER, it will have the opportunity to fire the ammunition in the breech and eliminate you.
This does not happen with NATO vehicles because the crew (ammunition handler, gunner, and commander) are eliminated with the first shot and, consequently, the vehicle’s breech.
I don’t know how far you want to go with this idea that Russia is inferior to everything else in the game, when in fact it is superior to EVERYTHING else in the game. I must remind you that a fuel tank explosion in a “small” vehicle with an ammunition reel in the back should blow up the vehicle.
Oh, of course, I forgot, this is a Russian vehicle, and that doesn’t happen because the vehicle’s ammunition is covered with water, and the fuel has Stalin’s blessing not to ignite.
1 Like
122s are much better armored than 2A5.
And also, wow, tanks having weakspots. Tragedy.
I did and it worked, your point ?
So all those crew knockouts and ammo explosion kills were just a part of my imagination ?
Where did I say that ?
Please follow the conversation.
It simply isn’t, even your own stats don’t agree with you.
Fuel explosions of internal fuel tanks do indeed kill tanks immediately.
Works on pretty much every tank that has them.
8 Likes
You’re acting crazy around me, talk to yourself.
1 Like
It’s a shame your own stats contradict your statements.
No wonder you’re backing out as you obviously have no idea what are you talking about.
I won’t even go over your sub 1 K/D in impressive R-73 and R-77-1 planes. I guess even RU bias can’t carry bottom of the barrel players to average performance.
This is like talking to delusional silver in CS about game balance. Ego through the roof, skill through the floor.
6 Likes
Oh, wow.
You’re actually serious.
I’m not a Russian main; I am a German plus Japan main, lol. I’m just grinding Russia.
The Russians have, on average, a weaker shell, weaker mobility, weaker reload, and more fragile weapons system (you often literally knock their entire firepower on one shot) versus NATO tanks.
They do have above-average survivability and armor, but they’re most definitely not unkillable.
For such “powerful” vehicles, your K/D/S on them… aren’t stupidly high, aren’t they?
Guess even the great Russian bias is incapable of handholding you into being as good as you say their tanks are.
2 Likes
You don’t want the game to be realistic, either.
Trust me, that goes BOTH ways.
All nations are gimped at some state and form @ top tier; if you wish for all vehicles to be modeled realistically, BOY will the monkey paw curl on you.
You have ZERO clue on what you’re talking about, this gotta be ragebait.
Any of the 122s, 2A7, and Abrams are just better than the average Russian MBT, save for the BVM; the ONLY top tier MBT that is genuinely good in that tree.
I’d take the Type 10/90s over them any day of the week.
3 Likes
What is that ? @NecronomicaIs “monkey paw” some kind of English slang that I’m not familiar with?