lmao i knew it
Great detective work Sherlock, its not like i make it a secret that i dont have any desire to waste my time playing that tech tree. But it says a lot that you guys somehow think that you have to have played the tree to make an observation that has nothing to do with how good the tree performs.
sounds like you suck at aiming and blame your skill issue on russian bias
1 Like
But my claim perfectly describes why you’ll see much more claims of RU bias than of any other nation.
Rule bending and OP vehicles for other nations fly under the radar extremely often, which just strengthens my point.
And what exactly do any of my comments have to do with my aim? Or are you just talking out of your backside without actually putting those eyes to use?
Sure i wont deny that i probably have a more lenient view towards vehicles that benefit my most played nation but the same goes for any other player so why would there be still so much consensus regarding who gets the bias. Also im not disputing that other countries get rules bent to their benefit as well but you need so many different examples from so many tech trees to match the russian benefits.
I already told you this.
Yeah irl biases which i do agree with that they play a role for sure, the averager “muh russian equipment bad why gud in game” is precisely that but stuff like the complaints about the 38MT and LMUR are absolutely not that. A lot of the newer complaints arent even about russian stuff overperforming but rather russian stuff performing up to brochure spec while everyone else doesnt.
Like how they made the lmur actually loft and do top attack no problem… And then its impossible for them to make the spike able to do the same.
1 Like
That is pretty much the stuff im talking about. My opinion on that doesnt change, no matter if i ever play russia or dont or how good russia is in the current meta or how bad. Its a blatant double standard in any of those situations
Double standards like how they took ages to move the Puma up in BR? And the T58? (OH, its still undertiered).
Compare that to the rapid BR change of the BMPT’s…
Problem with the t58 its good against anything same as most 35mm spaa.
The puma got moved literally 10 days after its release, what are you talking about? And no not like the T58, that thing is undertiered and so is the BMPT but at least the T58 doesnt get its internal ammo categorized as external for whatever reason
Yeah thats crazy that it still has that it should be like it is on the marder IFV’s
2 Likes
how do you know its internal or external ?
unless you got docs you cant prove it.
and tbh there are other weak spot to hit.
from the way this is modeled ingame rn what do you think would happen if you hit the ammo?
1 Like
Good question. The answer is that i can see the ammo being on the inside of the vehicle compared to picture 2 where the armor is very much not on the inside of the vehicle. If the armor was more internal it would literally poke the crew in the back
1 Like
@H_ngma @JohnWarthunderer let me say it again.
how can you prove the thing you says, i know about the video.
so unless you got docs about the ammo deto on the bmpt, nothing gonna change.
Bro use your brain for a second here were does the ammo from the guns go… You dont have to be a rocket scientist to find out that shit will blow up the entire ammo rack as its modeled ingame rn
There is no way this isnt ragebait right?
Idk what youre trying to say dude, this question should be fairly easy to answer. Is the belt inside or outside of the crew compartment?