I’m glad you said it:
Russia has negative winrates for 33/35 total Battle Rating brackets.
Russia has positive winrates for 2/35 total Battle Rating brackets.
And I’m just pointing out that those who do, tend to be players who’ve never played Russia top-tier themselves and/or are bad at the game and wouldn’t be able to tell for that reason anyways.
Exactly but you don’t see the community go off about those, do you?
And I do not care about the handpicked cadre of content creators you pull out. Look at the general community, the posts here and the fact that russian bias is such a longstanding thing in the community. Acting like the group of people that believe in some sort of russian bias is non existent is complete reality denial.
And just to be clear, russian bias doesn’t automatically mean that russia is the best at everything it just means preferential treatment
You’re delusional.
Russians have the best MBTs armors, LMURs, BMPT/72s, ammoracks that don’t explode, reload buff (reload as quick as MSC now), 4-ready-to-fire ATGMs IFVs, IRST/HE shells absent on several NATO MBTs, Pantsir-S1 with 12 missiles ready to fire, SU-30MK2 spams, IS-7, that russian ship which doesn’t even exist IRL, BMD IFVs (1 autocannon AND 1 cannon, wow).
What does NATO have to counter all that ? Broken Spikes, carboard MBTs armors, IFVs with only 1 autocannon (no main cannon), IRST and HE shells absent on several NATO MBTs, ridiculous SPAAs, let’s not even talk about middle tier tanks.
The russian bias is obvious, more than obvious, stop trying to hide it from people.
And to nobody’s surprise, your stats in Russian MBT’s aren’t any better than in your non-Russian MBT’s.
In fact, the Leopard 2A7V (which has been the shared #1 best tank for 2+ years now) is the stand-out and best performing MBT you have stats-wise.
Meanwhile, your T-80BVM stats are middle of the road (like the tank itself) and your T-90M stats are among the lowest.
What??? I have a 3/1 kd in both the t80bvm and t90m? Your a bot
That is NOT middle ground
Lier, they dominate every top tier BR, especially 12.7-13.0, because the russian bias doesn’t care about older BRs. It’s only about showing how good the very modern russian gear is, that it is better than any western stuff in the world.
“Russia performs, Russia is better than anyone else”. When are you going to stop blindly defending Russia, man ?
They pay you or what
He’s a bot, he told me I was a bad player while I only grinded France for 1300 hours lol.
There is literaly no bad France main players in this game, as France sucks at any BR, and you have to deal with it.
Of course you’d dismiss those who’d know better than you (and the general playerbase for that matter).
As always: Poor/inexperienced players can be easily identified by them overrating the importance of armour.
Feel free to continue complaining about Russian Bias, I’ll be enjoying my under-tiered NATO MBT’s and clubbing said Russian MBT’s with ease, thanks to players exactly like yourself who are bad at the game and result in constant BR hand-outs due to statistics-based matchmaking.
PaKpuma.
XP-50.
Aerfer Ariete.
M4A3 105.
M1 Abrams.
AH-1Z.
Leopard 2A5.
German KV-1B.
CW-21.
TURM III.
IPM1.
Coelian.
HE 100.
P-39N.
J2M2.
R3 T20.
Mitsubishi T-2.
EBR 1954.
Gepard (TIer I).
Harrier.
SdKfz 140/1.
F-14A.
VIDAR.
Kpz/MBT-70.
Puma.
T18E2.
Ki-44-II.
T58.
Calliope.
P-59.
Conqueror.
Centurion Mk.3.
I can keep going, but it’s fairly pointless.
Simple question, what’s 287 divided by 119?
You can literally make the same list with people that believe in a bias. But I guess there’s a reason why that’s the only part you answered to
Challenge accepted.
Name me five players with equal skill and experience across different tech trees as those I mentioned who believe Russian Bias exists.
sweden… APDS (1.0), strv 122B+, Strv 103С/Strv 103-0, Strv 122B PLSS, CV90120-T… yeah you’re right … terrible!
Typical russian MBTs gameplay : rush corners at 60hm/h, weakspots are so tiny no one can 1 shot it 7 times out of 10.
Typical NATO MBTs deaths : get pointed at, clicked at → DEAD. Anywhere the shell hits, DEAD.
No one cares about gun depression, reverse speed, gun handling. The way 95% of the games are won is by having an excellent armor + excellent fire power.
Russians rush you, kill you, easy. Russians camp in their spawn, kill you, easy.
And it is WELL KNOWN XP-50 is as OP as BMPT is. Everybody complained about XP-50.
Are you good man ? Do you have mental difficulties to process things ?
You’re a bot, surely you work for Gaijin and defend the russian bias saying it doesn’t exist, because it’s exactly Gaijin’s plan to do so.
LFP, THE WHOLE TRACK AREA, corner of MBT…ect ect. tiny. yeah.
You have to think IN COMPARAISON to NATO MBTs, my intelligent man.
Which are NATO weakspots counterpart ? EVERYWHERE
You POINT the HULL, SHOOT → DEAD.
You point Leclerc’s turret, shoot → DEAD (ridiculous).
It’s not the same difficulty to destroy a russian MBT than to destroy a NATO MBT, stop lying ffs
Btw : LFP, the whole track area, corner of MBT are also NATO MBTs weakspots… so it’s not even an argument lol
“Just aim at the LFP bro”
Bro, the LFP on russian MBTs represent 1/1500 pixels on my monitor for a 1500m distance shot
Same shot against NATO MBTs, you literally have the whole tank you can hit to kill it.
It’s 145% dishonest to say russian MBTs are easier to kill than NATO MBTs, it’s just not true lol.
I somewhat regularly record every match I play, I then compile each and every shot I’ve taken against a certain type of opponent (Russian top-tier vehicles in this case) and then gather the data.
71% of my shots against Russian MBT’s results in a one-hit-kill.
74% of my shots are through side armour.
They’re amongst the easiest MBT’s to reliably one-shot given their cramped interiors, exposed ammunition everywhere and limitation of only having 3 crew total.
Complaining about these vehicles being difficult to kill is essentially an admission of poor aim.
Firstly: Stop being bad at positioning then. You seemingly allow your opponents to spot you first and hit your weakspots first.
Secondly, That’s the Russian MBT experience as well, but of course you wouldn’t know because you’ve never played them yourself.
Make the same video against Leclercs / Abrams / Arietes / Merkavas / Types. You can shoot literally EVERYWHERE on the tank, it dies.
Stop compairing russian MBTs weakspots and NATO weakspots, there is literaly a russian bias no one can argue about.
No one can say “I kill a Leclerc as easily as a T-90M”, it’s just NOT TRUE
