Ok enough hand waving … Where is the North Carolina, or the Colorado or … whatever !
3 nations have had their navies beefed up with 16+ inch guns. Where is USN ? And where is the BR decompression? Start giving naval some love here snail ! Especially USN.
I suspect decompression for naval won’t happen until they give air a unique BR for naval like they do for GRB - other wise the jets vs Dreadnoughts silliness just gets worse and perhaps that’s something even Gaijin can recognise…
Sure valid point, it’s just that naval always seems to be the runt of the litter and the logic becomes circular example: 1) Not enough people play naval so changes are not a priority BUT —> 2) Changes are needed to make naval more interesting to get more people … BUT —> back to 1)
USN didn’t use a 410mm only a 406mm
dude, bruh, seriously? like DUH ?? Main Question —> Where is the North Carolina, or the Colorado ?
The title says 410mm, which the US didn’t use
No kidding, also not the point and you know it. Stop trolling
What were you expecting exactly, the title you wrote is literally impossible and the ship in the files will come eventually, its literally just a case of being patient
Ok you are a troll, good for you, take a cookie and go away.
Tahh, what’s up someone ruined your fruit breakfast xD.
And even if he was my bf what’s wrong with being gay nowadays lol
I’m not an item thank you, I’m am a human being : (
You sure about that
Because it seems like i did here
One was rumoured to be delayed last major. Wait for the Dev Stream tomorrow and see if one is revealed for the US this update
Really, that is good to hear ! Hopefully that is true.
LoL Sometimes it seems that way. But, I think in all honesty, that Snail is really trying to maintain game balance whilst not offending others national loyalties - which is an impossible task. I think however that they go over the top in doing so, and end up twisting history into a pretzel in the process.
Rennie isnt a troll. The USN never had 410mm guns 16"/50 is 406mm and he was just pointing out the inaccuracy in your title only for you to be aggro back.
I think this is more from a game balance perspective, the USSRs top tier ship is just a British ww1 ship so the real cool British, german, American and Japanese stuff cant be added too easy
USSR’s top ship is a fictional Kronshtadt which only had a keel laid. The hair splitting over incorrectly labeling a 16 inch 45 caliber naval rifle as a generic 410mm crossed the line and was frankly just obnoxious period. So yea I was lazy, for which the game does to a painful degree by referring to, for a single example of many, all .30 caliber machine guns (ballistic caliber, not artillery) as 7.62mm, which they are not. OK so if it wasn’t trolling it was so OCD as to be deliberately annoying. It also wasn’t the point, which is when does USN get a capital ship with a battery larger than 14" when 3 nations already have. And cherry picking facts to derail and twist a topic is the definition of trolling, sorry. But I do appreciate the candid, cogent and mature presentation. I just think you are completely wrong.
Mate the WT community is autistic af when it comes to completed vehicles accuracy. I spent a couple days working on a bug report for the thickness of armour on the tortoise assaust tank after all. the difference in bore size to what you said is like calling the sherman 76 an 80mm gun it just rubs people wrong.
the main issue with that is that the US ships with the meatier guns were also superior in armour. its just an issue of balancing which will slowly be less of a problem unless gaijin abandons naval