but you said the stryker wasnt a battle taxi???
striker not strYker, i misread. my definition still stands
i saw my mistake in vehicle identification and admitted it
all good
1 Like
The one I can find USMC EFV prototype, both LAV-25 & 30 TOW and Bradley proposed upgrade prototype with 30mm. There is also Stryker Dragoon with 30mm & Javelin ATGM or JLTV with 30mm using modified M230 Apache gun firing HEDP I think.
heres the armys website https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2018/army/2018strykericvd.pdf?ver=2019-08-21-155808-150 THIS IS PUBLIC NOT CLASSIFIED
it gets sabot
What about the Merkava is it a tank or a IFV because it can hold like 6 people in the back or Namer 30 thats coming to the game that is based on the Merkava.
Wait is the M230 variant mount on JLTV have sabot? I don’t recall any development on that.
it did on dragoon so they probably could implement the sabot since its the same gun and caliber
I guess? But I expect it have less pen since it use 30x113mm instead of Stryker 30x173mm.
my b
The 152mm APFSDS on the obj 292 is the best round in game in pen and spall
No problem. It just I don’t how much pen you can get out of 30x113mm velocity since the HEDP have at least 50mm pen at all range.
I was speaking MBTs, not tank destroyers given medium-tank spawn points as an alleged nerf.
- You said best round in game, never specified
- The object 292 was an MBT testbed for the 152mm gun like the Abrams CATTB, not a tank destroyer. It is on a T-80 hull with a T series style turret with T-80 armor and a Russian MBT style autoloader and crew layout, and MBT mobility
2- It was a gun test bed, not an MBT test bed.
Which is why it only features one gun: The 152, a basic FCS for testing, and that’s it.
It’s effectively an M10 Wolverine without a machine gun and turret roof.
M10’s on an M4 chassis, doesn’t make it a medium tank.
This is also about IFVs, sir.
i dont want to be that guy but this abt ifvs lets get back on the subject
1 Like