When can America get more ifvs?

lav25 would be great for that br, spall liner, sabot, same gun as bradley and same platform as the lavad.

So was Warrior and now Ajax, but not as anti-tank but anti-infantry, unless enlisted and WT merged so we have soldiers running around too I find support vehicles an odd addition

How about some sweet; sweet HMMWV first?

YESSS HMMV tow

the lav 25 was used to kill both amvs and troops.

Dm53 is the best with 3bm60 behind it

I was thinking Automatic 40 Mike-mike

Bradley with L7 105mm cannon when?

1 Like

lolno. 60 degrees penetration at 100 meters:
M829A2 is the best: 724 out of L/44.
DM53 is 2nd best: 716 out of L/44.
Then Type 10.
After that is M338 at 702.
M829A1 is 690.
M322/CL3143/m/95 [they’re all the same round]
KE-W [allegedly].
Then 3BM60 penning 666mm of armor, on-par with DM43 fired out of an L/52 [GIAT] gun.

M2A4
image
he effort will install lighter tracks, shock absorbers, a new suspension support system, and heavy weight torsion bars.ECP2 will restore automotive power with a larger engine, a new transmission, and a smart-power management system for better electrical power distribution to accept future networked tactical radio and battle command systems.

AMV is just another name for IFV, still not a tank, its job is to deal with foot soldiers and light support vehicle and leave tanks to be dealt with by tanks

The bradley was designed to fight tanks, its a light tank at the core with the ability to hold troops

Yea in operation desert storm Bradley’s had some of the most highest kills during the entire gulf war.

thats not what it was made for, its design doctrine is to protect soldiers from light fire while being fast enough to keep up with abrams (which it was designed alongside) for an advance. yes it carries TOWs as a backup but that’s not its core design philosophy

2 Likes

what about this

1 Like

ifv or tonk???

Yes

Oh my goodness that thing looks amazing! A T62 with BMP turret is so derpy looking but I have no idea how the hell that would fit in the game due to strong armour on a small chaingun but id love to see that in game, its similar to the leopard 40/70 in that sense

1 Like

What abt the stryker dragoon? its not a armored taxi according to you,
image

1 Like

its an infantry carrier vehicle so it is indeed a battle taxi, it was made to carry soldiers to battle and to fight alongside as backup. Its not a tank

1 Like