I think im going to put in a counter report saying there is ZERO mention of actual turret speed and that it should be normalised based on its closest peer. Warrior.
4 Likes
hmm i think scorpion has something about its turret traverse btw
1 Like
do send it my way if you find it. Scorpion information is usable for scimitar as they are identical other than gun in their initial configurations. same for sabre as its a scorpion with fox turret
1 Like
Ah right well that bins that then doesnt it
1 Like
did you find it?
1 Like
Its not usuable its about the scorpions systems. no definitive turret traverse rates so.
Think going by warrior is a better solution, seeing as 1. warrior is in game and 2, has more data for it.
the only difference between scimitar and scorpion is the gun, everything else is identical between the vehicles so does still have merit to getting the vehicle correct
1 Like
Suppose I can try that mate, I was meaning in relation to the fox.
Which suppose makes no sense why did jarms use the scimitar report, which does actually have sources, while non actively cite a definite number, to nerf the fox?
It makes no sense.
Two of said sources, I’ve read on my PC in scotland and they do not mention turret traverse speed.
They mention that over the years it went from manual to an upgraded faster FCS.
Soooo
the reports are junk IMO
1 Like
Just Gaijin
1 Like
I have no clue. he’s also responsible for the report that gave the 3.7 ram 800hp, by using a document which got figures blatantly wrong (as if it wasn’t obvious it was wrong)
I believe this was either for scimitar 2 or its LEP upgrade significantly after the model we have in game existed
1 Like
Yes however the sources do mention that before it moved onto the full upgrade program, they were trialing the standard Scim with an improved FCS for both turret traverse and target acquisition
I musta missed that one…
1 Like
That’s nothing new…Gaijin can make changes for whatever reason.
1 Like
I like the Falcon to go back to 7.7 it fills the gap perfectly and back when it got moved up there was a high use of apds and dodgy heat mechanics when most the tanks were empty and because lack of spalling on apds that increase its br
1 Like
What drugs do you take bro? Tell me so i can start too
1 Like
Should i reply fully realistic and without bs? Guns till 7.7 br is about 7/10 and from 7.7 till Top Tier is about 5, Mobility 1/10. , Armor 3/10 except from Churchill. Is it worth to grind-- NOOOO… ( No hate, just realistic. )
Fox got nerved now the crown for ultimate rat get XM800
In the years of playing the British tech tree I have watched the 20 pounder tanks get up tiered from 6.3 to 7.7, and because of the shell shatter whilst the number on the stat card may be big, you effectively have the lowest pen, lowest post pen and worst platforms, the stabiliser was an advantage in 6.7 battles but now it fights things with APDSFS, composite armour and 60 to 70kph top speeds in a centurion mk3 from the 1940s because the brainlet German mains can’t handle having their Tiger 2s killed frontally by a tank thats slower and worse armoured.
2 Likes
It keeps being an advantage at 7.7, dont act like most 8.0 and 7.7 have stabilizer
100% Cant remember the last time I played the Cent’s since they went to 7.7 as there are far better tanks ect at that BR than the Cent’s
Uh what tank is the cent mk 3 facing with all that?
also the conq is a 7.7 which slaps like mad