No ERA. It’s a strv 81 rearmed with a 105 mm gun and a new FCS, including laser and thermals
Never heard of it armed with thermals
not Swedish but i would like to see some tanks from other Nordic countries.
NM195 STINGER
BMP-25
ITSPV SU-57-2M
T-72 MK1 FINMOD 1
M4A3E4
K2NO KAPPS
T55M MEXAS
M41 DK-1
5 Likes
ITPSV ZSU wouldn’t really do much, as was stated they looked at the ammo for the prox fuse but never actually tested it with said vehicle as by the time it was ready they had other more viable SPA
Im also against the K2 for now as we dont need more top tier MBT’s for a while imo, everything else is fine but i cant believe you skipped the beautiful danish ETS program.
unfortunate about the proxy though would like the K2NO as it is a bit of a upgrade to the K2 though they couldn’t fully upgrade it to what they wanted.
K2NO would be slightly different to if the K2 were added to the SK subtree tree, just a APS and a bit more composite. no loss though if it isn’t added to the game.
The tall ones are the Danish ETS vehicles and the other 2 are finnish vehicles
I tried doing a suggestion for the Mowag ETS but since there is so little info on it stat wise with the turret mounted its hard to get info on its stats without just guessing by adding weight and seeing the M113 ETS. Our government also lists some other vehicles that could be mounted with the ETS but i didnt find any evidence that we mounted the turrets outside of theoretical mounting.
2 Likes
M901 could only dream of such greatness
Depends on if gaijin adds Denmark to Sweden as both DK and NOR aren’t officially under the nordic TT so they can realistically go wherever gaijin pleases
hopefully soon they’ll start adding TT Danish and Norwegian vehicles to Sweden/ doubt they’ll anywhere but Sweden, then again gaijin might butcher them like they did with the Netherlands.
1 Like
Eh DK could go to the germans considering ive talked to quite a few that for some reason think we belong to them for being close amd some of us speaking Deutsch. Literally the only reason they want us is the F16AM and to prevent sweden from getting the 2A7VDK, imo its a dumb choice to think DK should go anywhere else but with our nordic brothers but im not gaijin i dont make the decisions. I personally dont really want the 2A7 or the F16AM nearly as much as a united DK/NOR 5th air line with our unique vehicles filling gaps in the TT and adding a bunch of diversity for air. People worry about C&P when 90% of sweden is a fighter and a strike version of said fighter. So having stuff like canadian vehicles and modified swedish vehicles would be very cool imo.
1 Like
Eh, 'least for this I would say adding it is warranted. Would be a nice spaa tbh
Would be a better looking spaa to add as i dont even know if they mounted a radar to it or not, doubt it would be much higher than 7.0, most likely a .3 increase
WZ305 is 8.0 sooo…
Yes because it has prox shells, the ZSU 57M would be either 7.0 or 7.3 as even with a radar prolong fire causes inaccuracy which defeats the purpose of it being used as an spaa.
(Im saying no prox shells)
1 Like
Something about this just feels off
1 Like
Yeah sorry not thermals I’m pretty sure, but night vision equipment. Same FCS as found on the strv 104. Could get somewhat different ammo but would otherwise be like a 104 with worse mobility and no ERA
That’s not FINMOD, just a T-72 VISMOD used for troop training/identification
Been told by a guy who’s very well read up on finnish gear that Finland actually tested Chinese 57 mm HE-VT for the ZSU-57-2 in Finland but found issues with fuzing. Specifically:
“that ran into the problem that the fuses on them worked too well in testing, sometimes the proxy fuse would notice the round shot by the other barrel and go off because of it, taking out both rounds”
From what i had seen was it used the same ammo as the 101 but with 104 FCS and ERA, which imo we dont really need the 102 as its not particularly useful addition wise, id rather time be spent on fixing the 103’s and the gun depression bug than another near exact cent with worse mobility.
Yeah, i had read that it was chinese VT ammo they had bought but i never found info that they had tested the round. Again gainin had plenty of chanves with finland to add unique vehicles instead of Control C and Control V
Finmod 2 with the 22kph reverse and 890hp engine wouldve been nice alongside the T55 AM-1 or personally the 155mm howitzer T55, or hell even the charioteer with the 105mm gun. Again gaijin literally gave zero care to any of there vehicles i mean the camos are wrong half of them just use swedish camos or have the wrong sized roundel or its missplaced.
1 Like
Strv 101R and strv 102R are turret modernizations for the 101 and 102, referred to as torn-REMO (turred renovation and modernization). Better sight, new FCS, new turret drive, and Lyran illumination mortars. Strv 102s may also have recieved the frontal armor of the strv 101 (mk10s have thicker hulls than the mk3) but I’m not entirely sure of that, but that latter part may be where the misconception regarding ERA comes from. Neither the 101R or 102R ever had ERA, that came with the strv 104 which was mostly carried out in parallel. And yeah, ammo between the models is the same but what is missing in-game is slpprj 90 which would be a higher penetration APFSDS round that came along in the 90s (there’s also a shorter slpprj 90S to fit in the strv 103 autoloader). Would be logical to give that to the 104 or an alternate “104 late” and then have the 101R/102Rs top out with the m/80. That way you could have them differ in protection, sights, mobility and potentially also firepower