What Vehicles are Sweden in most need of ”the wishlist”

I have pictures of this!!!

Yeah knowing more about its background would be interesting. It seems to have been a rather low level improvisation rather than anything formal. Considering the lack of mobile AA, especially in an engineering unit, it might have made some sense at the time. There are quite a few photos of it from testing at least, including of a rather interesting camo solution
FB Miliseum. 40 mm eldberedd på troligen Volvo N7-10. Farb testar koncept närluftvärn för Ingenjörtruppern. Enl uppgift olämpligt att skjuta sidledes.  Aug1987

4 Likes

That tent is gonna turn it into a damn premium

It was to reuse the PBV-301 turret with ungraded commander optics, however the space the ammo took up in the compartment was too much, so they resorted to the FN MAG.

The Tank Archives article says the tank could only hold 40 rounds for the m/45B, do we know if that was the entire gun’s capacity or just the reserve ammo? The Pbv 301 in-game has 75 shells per clip, so I’m wondering if they were downsized to fit in the Strv 103 or not.

Does anyone know if the Finns had any specific nicknames for there MBR-2s?

Possibly, but then still comes the issue of ammunition to be able to reload the cannon.

Is there any documentation and/or images of the J-35-13?

I wonder what happened to the Strv 101R that was leaked a while back, the USH came but not that. Not that it would add much but still.

Kv-1 came also it could be thr R just doesnt have a place 8.3 just isnt a viable lineup and using apds at 9.3 is essentially a death sentence with how compressed th BR’s are playing a 8.0 strv with era and a laser rangfinder just doesnt sit well with me. Ive played the 8.3 stbs and uptiers are rough.

Honest question, but where would you see the NM116 be at in br? My mind says 6.7 but might be higher for all I know.

1 Like

Probably 7.7 maybe 8.0 though nost likely 8.3

Its small with a laser rangefinder and a 90mm with heat fs.

Lowest though would probably be 7.7

And thats if gaijin adds it to sweden as both norway and denmark are unconfirmed to be exclusive to the nordic tt

2 Likes

@Necronomica with gaijin changing the lineups BR looks like we finally have a purpose for the AJ and AJS, well not really but hey at least the AJS fits on a lineup now, not that ill use it but hey, its usable.

Good point :)
The AJS will now fit right inside a lineup ^^

For now ;)

102R?

This is a sentence

101R, referencing this list from a while back.
oifoksfoisefgk

What do you mean by sentence though?

Eh idk the 101R imo feels like it will just be a meh 8.3 but lacking the firepower to handle uptiers

Edit idk the numbers lmao

It doesnt really have a good spot. 8.3 with only apds and pretty useless ERA wont make it a good vehicle. Also 8.3 really just doesnt exist. You could use 8.0 tanks but in terms of what the vehicle brings imo, it just doesnt seem like a good addition

Oh, reg forum shenanigans, saying the body of text want clear.