“Most of the parts are real”
“Just not assembled (so all that exists is a wooden mockup)”
The fact that you, and multiple people - actually believe this vehicle should come to the game in any form is absolutely ludicrous. It really makes me think, wow, this is the average community member for this game. Poor Gaijin, really.
Edit - absolutely no rules broken therefore this post being flagged is nothing short of satire
I never said i wanted it, you can check but you would also be a fool to assume gaijin wont eventually go down this route for adding vehicles. Also if you plan on crying about a suggestion someone posted is pretty pathetic if you ask me .
Does the in-game Pbv 302 have this gun elevation?
Imma be real.
I give zero shits if its paper, if its decently realistic and makes sense idm it- coelian is an example of that.
No you dont understand (insert nation) likes a tank that was never made they cant talk about it or share it waaaahhhhh! Seriously its pretty cringe crying about it like him but its exactly what i expect from him.
No? I like and share the WZ-111, which is a far more “realized” vehicle - but I’d never want it added to the game since only a fully built hull and a mockup turret exists. So it wasn’t an actual vehicle. So I don’t want it added.
While you are saying:
“Since we have the Object 292 now, this completely fictional design should be added” ??? (The false equivalence and the undertones are quite disgusting to me)
10 likes? In the thread discussing vehicles that Sweden “needs” (only the most handheld tree in the game) added to the game?
Again - I can only feel bad for the plight that Gaijin has brought upon itself.
Edited because someone appears to have gotten very angry over my post.
This post is far from taking itself seriously, im pretty sure i posted a dumb dainish Tuk Tuk with a dude in the back as a vehicle we need. You seem to just be taking this way to seriously which as an outsider makes sense. Seriously though you do just seem to want to cry about this forum and the community within it which is off topic. I ask that if you arent here to contribute that you would leave instead of continuing your cringe community tantrum here.
I am literally talking about the Swedish vehicle in the thread. Which does not exist in any functional form.
I am taking it as seriously as it is presented. Since you’ve started now calling what I’ve been saying a tantrum and “off-topic”, both false attempts to undermine what I’ve said (objective fact) - I think you’re the one taking things too seriously, since you’re literally actually crying about it.
Idk both your posts above had you crying about how much you dont like the community. Im just saying you’re the one who started going off topic with your little rant.
LOL WHAT
Speaking of paper vehicles, remember the Lansen?
This wouldve been great, though i do understand the concerns of this type of medium tank in the post war world, pursuing the Kranvagn was probably the better choice but still, this and the 25 Ton version look so good. These wouldve been especially good in game had they been built as low tier Sweden seriously lacks medium tanks.
Is that the HKP 4C
This seems to be getting more popular but I really don’t get where people get it. The design of Strv 2000 was not finalized and no parts were made for it. Yes it would have used some existing components and some armor trials were performed but no components for the intended tank were ever built. This would be completely different form adding an incomplete vehicle like Krv. Sweden also doesn’t really need it as there are still plenty more options for top tier
Wut type of bombs are those?
Sinkbombs for anti submarine duties.
Hkp 4 (Vertol 107) could carry two tp 45 torpedoes or six depth charges. May also have been able to carry up to four tp 42s. The smaller hkp 6 could also be armed with depth charges and may have been at least tested with torpedoes. Depth charges could in theory be used against tanks I guess but these would really only become viable if submarines are added
The Lansen was supposed to use the 57mm Pvkan if im not mistaken, the armour would have been alright.
Id compare it to a T-34 or that Italian “heavy” tank P40
Idk why people think im advocating it, i mean i didnt even like the post from Arkboi. I dont care if it gets added or not. Im just using info we currently know and am thinking ahead. Eventually gaijin will probably dip their toes back into paper designs when whats available runs out. I mean theyve gotten much more loose with paper or planned additions to vehicles in recent years to come. Again in all i dont see a reason for it in warthunder. Id rather see more stuff for the lower BR’s like the KV-1B or any of the other finnish aircraft since most of finlands real air tree is premium. Or better yet gaijin change their opinion on Norway and Denmark and make them combined as the 5th air line since gaijin couldnt even properly fill finlands air tree since they had to add a swedish hunter to it.
You are mistaken, it was to carry one fine 75mm cannon, most likely a 75mm pvkan. Later when the 25 Ton version was conceptualized it was upgraded to a long 105mm cannon.
Ah the Leo, as its called in WoT, i dont know much about this ive just seen this image before