if abrams sucks so much why is the m1a2t the 2nd best performing mbt right now behind the 2a7?
Because you backstab with it because you can’t do it head on? no the armour sux but the meta is mobility and firepower. Doesn’t matter it has inaccurate model. I don’t really take the game that seriously. Look at BMPT’s it’s a joke right now.
You’re comparing a vehicle’s performance to how players perform in it and creating a connection where there is none.
Ground Vehicle stats tend to be extremely high when it first comes out because usually the only people who have them are well experienced. As months go by, the stats of these tanks will go down and eventually plateau.
There is also other factors that affect a vehicle stats, such as the current meta, team comp, the amount of people playing said vehicle within a month and probably many more.
To look at the stats of a vehicle without acknowledging factors that play a part is foolish. Using vehicle stats as your “source” is even more so.
Rather you should look at a vehicle’s strengths/weaknesses and compare that to others. Your analysis of that is much more compelling than using a vehicle stats
In the year that you were gone, the Abrams and Leopard family of vehicles got turret baskets. Gaijin linked the baskets to the entire horizontal drive module so when they’re destroyed you lose traverse. Gaijin also added a large hydraulic pump in the Abrams in the hull that does the exact same thing (and has a fire chance).
its still much higher than the us m1a2. two functionally identical vehicles yet the us one performs significantly worse. surely can’t be because average us mains are dog water now can it 🤣
1 Like
your not much better
Maybe because it came out about a month and a half ago? I don’t see your point here…
We’ll have to wait months to see a trend. Of course I have no doubt that M1a2t will have better stats than the the US but I predict the different won’t big.
1 Like
your
first month even with the stock grind it’s doing 50% better than the American ones. It will probably remain #2-#3 well above the American m1a2s simply because it doesn’t have a brain dead us main playing it
Stock grind isn’t difficult if you already have apfsds. KEWA2 is an improvement but stop acting like KEW is M774. It has 110mm of more penetration than M829 (which is a stock round for top tier Abrams although it doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things).
1 Like
KE-W has more pen than DTC10-125, but you still want the mobility mods, smoke, Thermals etc.
Of course and all that is important but I disagree with the premise that stock grind is difficult when you have a really good round. It’s painfully slow yes but if you’re a good player, you’ll get parts&fpe within a game or two
How sad it is to see the forum. Instead of giving opinions and trying to help, you flame and insult each other to see who’s the most useless of all. What I don’t understand is how @kcns isn’t banned for being toxic. It’s absurd that in a game forum where thousands of people participate, this kind of behavior is allowed. He probably has problems or something, but things from home should stay at home.
He derailed the topic by saying that the Abrams is a good tank, and nobody has said otherwise. The issue is that the turret ring is made of paper. I’m tired of it—I came back after a long time, only posted a couple of messages to talk with the community, and it’s the same as always: little kids with no arguments, and on top of that with no experience in what’s being discussed, giving their opinions and insulting when they’re contradicted or when their poor argument is challenged.
I won’t return to the forum; it’s absurd to see how people with white hair on their balls insult each other. Simply pathetic…
PD: Thanks to those of you who have left a sincere opinion, whether for or against the main thread I created, “the Abrams turret needs a revision.”
7 Likes
M8, this forum has been through this argument thousands of times by now; the Abrams is fine. Great in fact. Bad players suck with it and good players stomp with it. That’s all there is to the story.
3 Likes
He never said it was a bad tank, he just said the topic was derailed.
I have to agree and disagree. I agree that the PREMUIM Abrams is “bad” because of the player base “aka noobie wallet warriors”, however, top-top tier tanks such as the Abrams sepv2 stats are pretty bad and why is that different than the premium Abrams? Its because these people must have gotten tons of experience already with all the time grinding (unless you spend hundreds of dollars of ge to convert into rp and sl) and are still having a hard time with the tank. Also the Abrams is a good tank but its armor is really the only flaw. I don’t get why with all that weight that it has almost no armor. Especially frontal hull and the turret ring. That’s why the Abrams suck.
Because all that extra weight comes from the crews because american are fat /s
Click Bait’s stats during the past several months are neck and neck when compared to HC’s, it’s TT equivalent, so premium vehicles having atrocious performances because of wallet warriors is one of the many myths on this forum.
2 Likes
yes and I think its one of the more accurate ones and the Abrams having no armor
This premium myth definitely isn’t accurate.
Abrams also has armor.