They built a mock up, real enough for me (satire)
I fell in love with this fellow
Landsverk pansarbil fm/39
Casemate 37mm with full 360 8mm mg turret.
Very similar armament layout as M11/39
6 Likes
Do you have any other info on it?
No, even when you look it by full name it barely appears, so I don’t carry any sources on me.
There are some videos I found (it’s how I discovered it’s existance)
Swedish Armored Cars of World War II
Swedish tank Pansarbil fm/29, an experimental tank on display at the Arsenalen – Swedish Tank Museum
Love this toad me, been wanting this in game for years now. Wouldn’t be all that good sure but it’d be fun to play, a nice 1.0 vehicle, Sweden needs more armored cars in game anyways.
1 Like
that goober radiates pure weird swedish energy like this gross monster
Also
This is a 9030 yeah?
It has the smaller gun and rear crew sight compartment
4 Likes
Think it’s maybe the Insensitive Reactive Armor by Rafael before it got fully modified
A CV9030 Mk2 if i remember correctly
3 Likes
oh yeah, seems more likely if we account for that wedge piece on the front
Does the norwegian one have that crew cupola in the back tho?
yes they do
Yeah must be an early Norwegian CV9030 with add on armor then
Not sure if we ever talked about it (bad memory) but do we have a decent 9.7 CAS alternative at the moment in the Swedish tree?
Only aim 9B and only two of them for air but it has the same CM system as the later WDNS F-35.
This would be quite fun, still a heavier J35F but with some internal upgrades for CAS as the pylons were reinforced alongside fuel.
Otherwise we could just go SK60F and SAAB 105XT
4x RB24J
2x RB75
4x minigun pods
Yeah we have stuff, the real question does gaijin have the stones to add them
We also have like 9.0 Danish F100F
3 Likes
That is not the 105XT, that’s the Sk-60F. It could also mount CM in the inner most wing plyons like on the AJ-37. The XT is closer to the 105OE and 105G. Which the SAAB 105XT eventually became.
1 Like
Yup I have the names mixed up whoops, still the XT does cover the extended weapon loadout, guess we have two Saabs to cover the 9.x bracket
Also since I know you’ve looked at some of the Finnish stuff do you know if the MK.51 hawk has CCIP and such? Could be another 9.x strike fighter
IF the B3LA was added, would it be a 9.7 vehicle or a 10.3 one, speaking from the fact that it could carry eight RB83 (or four AGM-65) AGMs.
Then also the fact that the B3LA (as well as the Viggen) was supposed to carry the RB72, a high-performing IR missile that featured IRCCM capabilities. Supposedly, the RB72 was seemingly better than the AIM-9L in performance.
1 Like
Seemingly? We have docs that literally state it was. RB72 had 20 working models done of which after the program ended their seekers were used in the Mini Mavs. Tho I don’t believe a functional Mini Mavs was ever tested.
Didn’t know.
Judging by the overall size of the RB83, it would probably be somewhere of the performance of the AGM-114 missiles that the Apache has, unless there is some data about what explosive filling or type of engine it was supposed to use.