I’m referring to comparable vehicles that only use automatic cannons. It’s clear that ATGMs offer superior range.
Type 89 has superior accuracy at the same br no?
I don’t know about the game; most likely all the automatic cannons in the game will be equally accurate. But in the real world, the Badger’s cannon should be the most accurate model of automatic cannons.
Ofc I’m refering to in game man, IRL i’ve absolutely zero Idea xD
I’m not sure, but it doesn’t seem strange to me that the devs simply gave the same accuracy to all automatic cannons, regardless of the model or real-life accuracy.
I think they do have accuracy measured in game
The chassis is amazing for 9.0, the thermal is great, but the gun is so painful to use. Would pick falcon over this thing at anytime.
1 Like
I take the warrior over it tbh
I just finished spading it and have no intention of ever taking it out again. The gun has too slow a rate of fire to be useful, the chassis is too big to hide without any maneuverability or armor, and its only redeeming quality is the scout drone. I have not used the optical tracker outside of the test drive map and had no idea it existed: there was never any indication that I had one to activate in game, even while in the gunner’s sights. I tried it in the test drive after reading this thread and was unimpressed. Why use the Badger for SPAA duties when the ZA-35 is better in every way? It’s just as big, it’s faster, and it can drown light vehicles in fire. It doesn’t have sabot rounds or scouting, but I’d take the GA-35s over the Denel GI-30 any day.
I’m glad I spaded it so I never have to touch it again. If you don’t care about spading out the tree, ignore the Badger.