An entirely team of players with objectively better tanks is OP. There’s no way you can put it that it’s not.
I think the ‘op’ factor is balanced out in other ways (terrible/subpar spaa on the nations that have the 2a7).
Well, taken as 2 of the 4 have some of the best SPAA, looking at you france and Sweden, in addtion to powerful CAS, and 3/4 have a full lineup of Leo 2s. Yeah I don’t think those “factors” “balance” it out.
Abrams has a max speed of 78 km/h, while the T-80BVM has a max speed of 80 km/h. Oh yeah, that’s a big difference. By the way, mobility isn’t just about forward speed. The Abrams has good reverse speed (38 km/h compared to the T-80’s 9 km/h) and also features neutral steering. I know this is so hard for you to understand with your room temperature IQ.
1 Like
room temperature IQ isn’t an insult where I’m at.
What are you guys using, Kelvin?
Uhh, I’m use Fairheight and simply somewhere hawt
1 Like
Still, it’s actually kind of bad.
It’s not 86 here 💀
30 Celsius, not 86 Celsius.
Other way to do it, it’s orange cat iq.
2 Likes
You 100% have Canadian room temperature IQ.
Well then, it has to be 30°C or above, right?
MUCH bigger.
A BR which you don’t have so why are you entitled an opinion to it?
The Leopard 2A7 is better than any operational Abrams variant currently in service and that is still poorly reflected in game due to the lack of D-Tech hull armour and no Anti-ERA tipped DM round.
If you want the Abrams to be the best tank then go and play a game where the Leopard 2 doesn’t exist.
LMAO the Leopard 2 is a pile of crap irl. It’s over engineered asf to deliver nothing special.
So you have no idea what you’re talking about, case dismissed
1 Like
is that why sweden Greece and Turkey all bought the Leopard 2 over the Abrams?
3 Likes
The Abrams has lost to the Leopard in nearly every single acquisition trial to date, I wonder why they even bother sending them anymore
1 Like
German engineering at its finest