German engineering at its finest
lol yeah topic talking about Abram’s horizontal turret
what i expected to see is
talking about how it should be fix
what i really see is
blaming Leopard for their miserable lol.
2 Likes
What with the all the Red herring ?
Keep it on the topic.
Less likely cause it is quite big and u have bad depression. Also the breech area is big enough for me to bully near every time, u can one shot them through breech 50-60% of the time.
ZTZ99As have around 10-15% chance of firing back after being penned, cause the chance of a ±600mm APFSDS doesn’t destroy the autoloader or breech or gunner is near 0, plus the fuel tanks,
It is a pain to take on the first few games A7s are added. I had to make gambles on them taking more than 15 rounds and hope I can out load him by killing his gunner. (It is 7.1 second reload for me) ABRAMS are easy to deal with but they can still tank a shot occasionally when they are side on or just simply eats the round with UFP. Russian/Chinese tanks are universal weakspots.
1 Like
The annoying thing is when they don’t blow up, and repeated shots on ammo carousel doesn’t detonate it. Hair pulling moments for me because it makes not a single lick of sense.
1 Like
ABRAMS(Sep v2)HAVE A MAX SPEED OF 68/-38 IN RB
T80-BVM has a forward 78 and -12 in RB
You are the one that have 0 iq
even the T80B has a faster forward speed than any abrams exclude the M1 version
Reverse is just ur small excuse to denied other people claim
Ur pathetic ragebaiter
Eat sand
The BVM is 70km/h
The 90M is 60km/h
Neither of these are more mobile than an abrams
1 Like
Abrams is 68
T-90M is 67??
The M1 is 72
Everything after the M1 is 68
Do you have the t-90m on arcade mode
1 Like
I will kms
Every Abrams tank has a better engine than any T-series tank.
I don’t think so.
xd
2 Likes
Bruh, it’s just a game. Why are you so mad?
The T-80BVM has about 4 more hp/ton than the abrams, and the T-90m has 0.3 hp/ton less than the abrams. The T-80BVM is definitely more mobile going forward, but it trades it for reverse speed. The T-90m just has mid forward mobility and god awful reverse.
1 Like
Maybe I should’ve specified maneuverability instead of mobility, neutral steering and additional reverse gears are miles more effective in a gameplay setting and for that fhe Abrams is far more useful in transmission terms
1 Like
They are also heavier than any T-series tank
And original M1’s reportedly hit 70mph on roads for short periods so if anything the Abrams speed is nerfed because of governor being modelled
Even with governer, top speed should be 45mph which is 72 kmh not 68
Should also be able to take advantage of hills more since the turbine engine is better suited for it
It’s pretty easy to find hull down spots.
XD simping after one of the worst modern MBTs is wild.
1 Like
Yeah but the depression, also u are just as likely to die one shot by turret. Also not to say, ur only advantage is indeed manoeuvrability and most people probably want to emphasise it. I mean it is a bit of mess to say who is better but honestly both will likely lose ability to fight after a shot, be it horizontal drive for ABRAMS or autoloader for ZTZ99A.
ZTZs on average take less signifcant damage from shots to the turret, and as som1 who’s played tons of T-80, depression is not a major issue.
Abrams typically loses both engine and hori drive at the same time, so whilst ZTZ can move, aim, and fire one last shot, Abrams can’t aim or move.