It’s realistic. Additional modules have been added for pretty much every top tier tank at this rate.
After people complaining about the performance of some infantry fighting vehicles like the Schützenpanzer PUMA and light tanks (in reality a self propelled anti-air gun) like 2S38.
It’s not, while that component is part of hydraulic system; it’s actually the reserve Sump and not actually part of the pressurized loop.
The primary pump is driven off the engine and is located in said compartment as is detailed in the following report.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
It’s crazy how easy it is to disable the Abrams.
When they added modeled autoloaders to T-series tanks.
still better than russian tanks
Nice Bait.
I thought that it looked a bit too big to be just a hydraulic pump
agreed
Abrams have better mobility, APFSDS rounds, gun depression, and reverse speed, so it sounds like a skill issue.
In what ways is;
M774 better than 3BM42 (M1 vs T-80B)
M900 better than 3BM46 (M1IP vs T-80U)
It’s only with the move to the 120mm gun (M829 & up), does ammo become superior, and even then 3BM60 is available at far lower BR’s, and said tanks retain much better armor layouts and ERA options, as well as generally being able to fight against relatively worse armor.
Also a general immunity to expected / common CE threats is also nice to have at a BR.
Armor doesn’t matter if anything can lol pen you from the front.
At what range does M774 have an easy time against the frontal amour of a T-80B?
Just shoot the LFP. even rank5 can one shot it from the front.
Insane cherry pick, there are 120mm abrams with m829a2 at the same br
Which one has M829A2 at 11.3?
the M1HC is 11.7
M1A1 only has M829A1, and is 11.3
also the T-90 gets 3BM60 at 11.0
And M829A1 vs 3BM60 is far less of a difference than M774 vs 3BM42 no matter which way you slice it.
Also it’s not like it cares much about the M1’s armor schema, since even with the improved turret of later variants the GLATGMs still make short work of it let alone 3OF26 to the “Doghouse”, or Commander’s MG station / CROWS.
The T-80U is 11.7
lol
lmao even
And how many 11.3 vehicles are there in game, a tiny number, let alone only those in Tech trees (US has 2, Japan has 4, Italy has 1, Israel has 2)? You really won’t find many full downtiers at 11.3 due to such a low population so the comparison to 11.7s is realistic since it’s a near certainty that they will be a common encounter.
That must be why I’ve seen so many complaints about the Type 90 Fuji lately
As tripod2008 already point out that Gaijin internal model are wrong as irl Abrams hydraulic pump are next to the engine not in crew compartment like in game atm. Even with bug report accepted. It still take Gaijin long time to adjust (too long in some cases)