We need to change the requirements for modern MBT armor bug reports

[SPANISH_AVENGER]

Speaking of PURE bugs, bugs; could you take a look at this one?

It’s tremendously annoying and it’s 100% unintended and a bug: but even though it’s been 20 days, no one has even seen it yet, hence why I am resorting to you, hahah.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/duYXheyHvuJr

[Gunjob]

Cheers, forwarded.

[SPANISH_AVENGER]

Great, thank you, cheers!

[Zyszhao]

@Gunjob

Honestly its much easier to think of it as “incident” and “service request”, in IT an incident is something happening we never intended to happen (server crash, applications failing to run, loss of network connectivity, etc etc etc), where “Service Requests” are stuff like “I need this new application made available” or “there is a new config for application that needs to be distributed”.

Thanks! I don’t know why some players shout their report about X vehicle could have Y armament be sumbited as a suggestion or be noticed not a bug, cause J-8F couldn’t use PL-8B won’t crash the game…
So, if X vehicle’s in-game armament don’t have it’s real-world performance or it’s model/animation have mistakes, it’s a bug, while if it don’t have a armament could use but not shown in game, it should be a suggestion?

[Gunjob]

@Zyszhao

So, if X vehicle’s in-game armament don’t have it’s real-world performance or it’s model/animation have mistakes, it’s a bug, while if it don’t have a armament could use but not shown in game, it should be a suggestion?

Performance of a weapon would still be a suggestion. And weapon loadouts are always a suggestion. As they’re also used as a balancing criteria.