“what times man when ebr was 4.3 lol” i actually think its 5.3 to 6.0 tank level of performance and what should been from the start
i do
zbd 09 when???
1 Like
I mean ill take the chance for a pac puma
I’ve just seen the datamine… it’s looking very bad. They gave it worse sustained turn time, worse top speed (629km/h) and worse climb rate (15.1 m/s).
I am simply speechless.
I’ve never seen a source stating that the plane was slower than the original prototypes. I’d like to know where Gaijin takes these info from…
I hope (probably in vane) that the stats will be corrected on battlepass release
3 Likes
screw the rest of this battle pass I’m getting the L3/33 deco even if its only for ships
1 Like
I made for the re.2005 MM.495 VDM a suggestion years ago and I showed the differences between the re.2005 MM.495 VDM and the other re.2005
It should get the modified DB605AM engine from the Germans, that makes it faster, instead it wil be added only with the VDM propeller and it gets a worse turn time and climb rate, that’s really sad.
Modified engine by the Germans for the re.2005 MM.495 - DB 605 AM: like 605 A-1, but with a different compression rate and MW-50 system up to ~1815 HP special emergency power at 0 m at 2,800 rpm for takeoff with MW-50 injection and ~1700 HP at 2,800 rpm at 4,000 m for maximum power with MW-50 injection
5 Likes
Just when I thought the current BP was underwhelming.
So, maybe next BP will have only one vehicle prize?
I mean, zero vehicles would be kind of stingy even by Gaijin standards.
1 Like
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1obubdt/for_those_wondering_why_the_new_re2005_is/
@Nufeneguediz @S_bastienZ88 seems gaijin forgot to either change the db605a for a db605am, add the mw50 boost, or both
3 Likes
There is no chance for Pak Puma though? This is Pak Wagon, a 3.0 vehicle, entirely different thing
The next main reward will be repainted M55 for Israeli tech tree
1 Like
I already knew about your suggestion. I read it quite some time ago. It’s really well done and I saw all the many sources you used.
I have 9 idea why gaijin passed it just to use none of the sources you used.
Oh shit
If Gaijin wants to be accurate, they should equip the Re.2005 MM.495 VDM with the DB 605 A-1 engine. Additionally, they could include the performance data of the DB 605 AM, since the Germans modified the DB 605 A-1 by adding MW-50 water–methanol injection and changed the compression ratio.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eui3zudYm58C
2 Likes
If you think about it, if Gaijin keeps the Re.2005 MM.495 VDM the same — or even worse — than the regular Re.2005 Serie 0, then there’s no reason to grind the battle pass for the Re.2005. It would just be a waste of time.
1 Like
There are only 4 vehicles in a BP battle trophy, they are listed in the post: T55E1, Toldi IIA, Sd.Kfz.251/22, Ikv 73.
Your bug report is closed. They need book pages and cover attached to the bug report.
Only one of those vehicles is trash too, the other 3 are super good imo
The only one of them I have experience with is the T55E1 but it is essentially a hellcat at a much lower BR and even faster.
I want the T55E1 so badly, the Toldi is also really good and the halftrack with the 75 is a momster the IKV is pretty sad all around. 68pen at 2.7 lol
For real…
Modeling it this way is just against their own interests. I really can’t understand why they did it.
I have already seen many people saying they aren’t interested in buying the battle pass because the plane is quite bad and not different from the tech tree one. Please Gaijin for our and YOUR OWN good, fix the model!
2 Likes